IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] take a breather... Worse than NATed IPv4? [was IPv6 for mobile]

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 27 December 2010 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A989A3A686C for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 00:09:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UQOXN0axFWrm for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 00:09:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6FA3A686B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 00:09:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from joelja-mac.local (71-94-234-88.dhcp.mdfd.or.charter.com [71.94.234.88]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBR8Bf3o051593 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 08:11:41 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4D184A38.7080509@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 00:11:36 -0800
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: v6ops v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <20101226105047.GG3695@Space.Net> <C93D729F.17107%hesham@elevatemobile.com> <AANLkTi=JVnSiEggSD+mBthTwUqQdqTrJD-SUwJM55Wxm@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=JVnSiEggSD+mBthTwUqQdqTrJD-SUwJM55Wxm@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [v6ops] take a breather... Worse than NATed IPv4? [was IPv6 for mobile]
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 08:09:39 -0000

This thread is at 157 messages since 12/21.

It started with Mikael Ambrahmsson, describing the current state of play
with mobile-devices and v6 stacks.

I think it can safely take a timeout.

Enjoy the new year.

joel

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status