IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Proposed agenda

"Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com> Sat, 22 February 2014 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF86A1A00E4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 06:14:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.381
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.381 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IOsIN7M-yu0N for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 06:14:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cable.comcast.com (copdcavout01.cable.comcast.com [76.96.32.253]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342871A00E0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 06:14:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([24.40.56.122]) by copdcavout01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id C7WM3M1.118251669; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 07:13:52 -0700
Received: from PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com ([169.254.1.53]) by pacdcexhub05.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3d40:bdea:7266:7f5a%18]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sat, 22 Feb 2014 09:13:57 -0500
From: "Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Proposed agenda
Thread-Index: AQHPKe+GQ54cQ4Ch+0GNXdWWzntzpw==
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:13:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CF2E1939.1268BE%john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
References: <E40F2B19-A4C8-4DED-91B8-B6590224A268@cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr2GBgxBvhHL1F=GbBbTwUvr8eXfqzwmjWTx2shwFngz6A@mail.gmail.com> <E3F2DF53-903C-4FC4-AEFA-C38590E70247@cisco.com> <78AAA6FC-F422-41D4-88A7-58066118C919@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <CF2E18F1.1268BE%tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <CF2E18F1.1268BE%tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [68.87.16.247]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CF2E19391268BEjohnbrzozowskicablecomcastcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/dD_eREeZI0erpJRRn20qczcns6w
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Proposed agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 14:14:07 -0000

Adding this to the agenda makes sense.  We have seen evidence of issues related to IPv6 multicast, specifically link local, in large broadband deployments where WiFi is and is not in use.  In most cases to date these appear to be implementation issues.  It does not hurt to discuss additional optimizations or clarifications to help guide implementers.

This draft and other related work must consider how broadband deployments are enabling IPv6 in customer's premises.  Discounting this or making assumptions about how IPv6 should deployed from academic perspective will not be helpful to implementers or for the overall adoption of IPv6.

John
=========================================
John Jason Brzozowski
Comcast Cable
m) 609-377-6594
o) 484-962-0060
w) www.comcast6.net
e) john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com<mailto:john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
=========================================

From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk<mailto:tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>>
Date: Monday, February 17, 2014 11:29 AM
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com<mailto:fred@cisco.com>>
Cc: v6ops <v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Proposed agenda

Hi,

On 16 Feb 2014, at 00:35, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com<mailto:fred@cisco.com>> wrote:

Let me ask for comment on the list.

Folks, would you like to discuss this? I have a half hour to spare in the time we have suggested.

Yes, this is a worthwhile discussion to have, briefly.

Tim


On Feb 14, 2014, at 7:05 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com<mailto:lorenzo@google.com>>
 wrote:

On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com<mailto:fred@cisco.com>> wrote:
This is of course open to change; that's why it's called a "proposed agenda". Please post to the list.

Would there be time to briefly discuss:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yourtchenko-colitti-nd-reduce-multicast-00 ?

This will be presented in 6man during a session on the efficiency of the ND protocol, but I feel that it really belongs in v6ops, because it has no protocol changes.

Of course, since it was posted only shortly before 23:59 UTC, it fails the "has been discussed on the list" test. :-)

----------------------------------------------------
The ignorance of how to use new knowledge stockpiles exponentially.
   - Marshall McLuhan

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org<mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email