[v6ops] IPv6 Addressing Considerations

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Fri, 11 December 2020 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0C63A0CEB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:08:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7cAtHGtqQdGy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:08:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506423A0CEC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 08:08:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2800:810:464:8164:2564:6883:7d0c:efbb] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:8164:2564:6883:7d0c:efbb]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5FE3280A9E; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:08:33 +0000 (UTC)
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <5449dd52-6adb-488c-e4bd-58726218bbb4@si6networks.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 13:07:04 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/dyerAe9CiIXAIHwlWPXrWy4BpTk>
Subject: [v6ops] IPv6 Addressing Considerations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:08:41 -0000

Folks,

We have published a new Internet-Draft entitled "IPv6 Addressing 
Considerations".

It is available at: 
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-addressing-considerations-00.txt

The Abstract of the I-D is:

    IPv6 addresses can differ in a number of properties, such as scope,
    stability, and intended usage type.  This document analyzes the
    impact of these properties on aspects such as security, privacy,
    interoperability, and network operations.  Additionally, it
    identifies challenges and gaps that currently prevent systems and
    applications from leveraging the increased flexibility and
    availability of IPv6 addresses.


We have discussed this topic with some of you off-list, and part of 
those comments still need to be incorporated (apologies for the delay!).

However, we felt that this -00 version already contains quite a bit of 
material for discussion. (and given that there have been other recent 
threads related to IPv6 addressing on this list and on 6man@, we felt it 
would be timely to get this -00 version posted now).

Your comments will be very welcome.

Thanks!

Regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492