Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Thu, 05 February 2015 04:01 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A6F1A020D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:01:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SM6dDpy0vCMG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:01:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 823331A013B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:01:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mb-aye.local ([172.56.38.243]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t15415LZ048555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 04:01:06 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <54D2D1D7.8090502@bogus.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 18:13:43 -0800
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/34.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, david.binet@orange.com
References: <8B808F0C-1AA8-4ABE-A06E-80652B9C1498@cisco.com> <B7D61F30-BAC4-4BE0-A5FD-1D4BD4652E55@employees.org> <20150129201251.GD34798@Space.Net> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004902668@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20150130103924.GG34798@Space.Net> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004902889@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BF1BDC61-D8BD-4FB3-A111-070D9FF51F60@cisco.com> <3309_1423037455_54D1D40F_3309_6880_2_5cf9a995-53cb-40ee-b1ce-4fd9ca52b55a@OPEXCLILH02.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20150204083138.GB34798@Space.Net>
In-Reply-To: <20150204083138.GB34798@Space.Net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="feWhcUK9tCi99IDVbEjoA3XivpLXpKQVr"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/e1h-zxirVKJN1jHBIL-KyWUUZ7A>
Cc: "draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 04:01:10 -0000

On 2/4/15 12:31 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:10:54AM +0000, david.binet@orange.com wrote:
>> some people think that IPv6 deployment is done if 3% of the world population can benefit of some IPv6 connectivity. 
> 
> I notice that those that actually do deploy IPv6 are not those that complain
> about non-deployment.
> 
> So, how's Orange's IPv6 deployment coming on?

I think this out of line. disagreement on implementation one thing,
individual business  decissions may be influenced by things outside this
document.

> 
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster
>