IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-02.txt

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 01 October 2015 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE501A8845 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sCUXxrM_8wvD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 230591B2E99 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 11:39:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6464; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1443724753; x=1444934353; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=C95+rYj9ZkBe6PYw7osam9inLurFx67o6kziWW2IoTQ=; b=gADY2IYWcGfplrOrv6Pk6lGdAX6vFKrhSLL5cY15Aj4p+WJOCyFH9jmg gSe0saAhNLIqnIDzjDSXVJDoT/YJLnPM734g2qcyUtUA1Azqh+CzbJO31 yNhkGijhDz093DuPcQg1Pn4awMBFu4ZAIlzEaQzW7mMkBxFL13fZaDYX0 Y=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CqAgAgfQ1W/5RdJa1egydUbga9aw6BcQELhXcCgTY4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQkAQEBAwEBAQFrEAsCAQgEFCcHJwsUEQIEEw6IGAgNy3QBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBIkDgm6FCQuDGIEUBZV5AYJKgWFqh34DgU2ENo0IiEQBHwFDhAJxAYhxgQYBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,619,1437436800"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="31908018"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2015 18:39:12 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t91IdBGY028227 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 18:39:12 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:39:10 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 14:39:10 -0400
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHQ/Hh2hfda7NGFXUyar66yPH7vPA==
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 18:39:10 +0000
Message-ID: <E616A912-FC4D-4EBE-ABFA-17CD60CC5D79@cisco.com>
References: <20151001150947.6527.30286.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr3Xw=ddZieF0OzU=wyqs2P5WXvRh8CXn1S2qS6WEZmb9A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr3Xw=ddZieF0OzU=wyqs2P5WXvRh8CXn1S2qS6WEZmb9A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.154.253.79]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A34A20DE-E538-4D40-81FE-9EEA62900D58"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/e4BNhUZzvyE-ebe2_3XmcGJ4HNA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 18:39:16 -0000

Folks - I'd appreciate it if you would look at the update and comment quickly. The big new text is in section 4 and the security considerations. https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-02.txt <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-02.txt>

My issue is that I moved too quickly. I looked at the list traffic and noted that it had come to a hiatus, and assumed that Lorenzo/Andrew had dealt with the open issues. This draft is intended to be the update that does that. However - I filed it with the IESG. If I need to snatch it back, say so now, please.

> On Oct 1, 2015, at 8:13 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:09 AM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>> wrote:
>         Title           : Reducing energy consumption of Router Advertisements
>         Authors         : Andrew Yourtchenko
>                           Lorenzo Colitti
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-02.txt
>         Pages           : 6
>         Date            : 2015-10-01
> 
> The changes from -02 are as follows:
> Added a section on RA intervals and lifetimes.
> Added text on RA guard in the security considerations section.
> Both are in response to previous WG comments.
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email