[v6ops] Re: Working group Last call: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd

[Timothy Winters <[e-mail]>]

Hi David,

It was intended to update, so I've fixed that.   For the question on LPD-2
compared to L-2, there is the additional log to system management
requirement.

I've updated it too:

LPD-2: The IPv6 CE Router MUST assign a prefix from the delegated prefix as
specified in requirement L-2 of 7084. If not
enough addresses are available the IPv6 CE Router SHOULD log a system
management error.</t>

~Tim

On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 8:11 PM David Farmer <farmer=[e-mail]>
wrote:

> I support this document moving forward.
>
> Nevertheless, I think it needs to be clarified how it relates to RFC7084.
> The abstract says it updates RFC7084, but there is no updates metadata in
> the header.
>
> Does it replace or supplement the LAN requirements of RFC7084? For example
> LPD-2 seems to duplicate L-2, which implies it replaces the LAN
> requirements of RFC7084. But then other LAN requirements from RFC7084 seem
> to be missing.
>
> I think it should be much more explicit how these new requirements
> integrate with RFC7084’s requirements.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 10:19 Nick Buraglio <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> This message begins the working group last call for
>> draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd. Please read the draft and send your comments
>> in response to this email.
>>
>> The draft can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-lan-pd/
>>
>> nb
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list -- [e-mail]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>