IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

Wes Beebee <wbeebee@cisco.com> Wed, 19 October 2011 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <wbeebee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAA621F8B31 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.183
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.183 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.349, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tIAItgQJMmhL for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4186221F8B30 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=wbeebee@cisco.com; l=389; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1319053773; x=1320263373; h=date:subject:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=xM9eFXTD1gZwi2yr4uU1SCk2nr0iYQPzeZXLxyliBKE=; b=mYJ1QR1vM6mFix//X0i+9VhYK3vBpOjCQ2ExI0zzdWfieaqw7f7La6w5 TJAwzaNef9Lea11rePiT1X80cAT+3WaJTFAJ6CLVbyHXyL37FgAhMXriB 9M/hHBH48cmafAwX1QkIqmQkMtOhYvlPaP54+vrdCh8+28UISoNg+5QDr Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjwHAEUpn06tJXHB/2dsb2JhbABEiT2fRQKBBYFuAQEBAwESAScCAUENAQiBHQEBBAE0h16XTwGeSYgbBJN+hTOIFoQq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,373,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="29581139"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2011 19:49:32 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-102.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-102.cisco.com [72.163.62.139]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9JJnWDs023825; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:49:32 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-201.cisco.com ([72.163.62.208]) by xbh-rcd-102.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:49:32 -0500
Received: from 161.44.175.128 ([161.44.175.128]) by XMB-RCD-201.cisco.com ([72.163.62.208]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:49:32 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.31.0.110725
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:49:28 -0400
From: Wes Beebee <wbeebee@cisco.com>
To: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Message-ID: <CAC4A208.17CAE2%wbeebee@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
Thread-Index: AcyOmDYO0cO59bxHwEqy5mF62gV22g==
In-Reply-To: <FFA44E83-76C8-4CE0-B3CA-4409162DB62D@apple.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Oct 2011 19:49:32.0695 (UTC) FILETIME=[38DAFA70:01CC8E98]
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:49:34 -0000

>> I believe the issues around PCP not being ready are overstated. We have a
document (-15) ready for another round of wg last call to be started this week.

> If the -15 revision that I've seen previewed goes into WGLC, then I will agree
that PCP is ready for meeting REC-48 of RFC 6092.  The -14 revision is not
ready.

Congratulations!!!  I await with baited breath...

- Wes

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email