IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Wed, 12 October 2011 19:40 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB1421F85D1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XDlJuxPNBNyz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC7021F85B9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:21d:60ff:fed7:e732]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A35521F70; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:40:55 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4E95ED46.1010404@viagenie.ca>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:40:54 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110720 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
References: <201110111355.p9BDt1M23806@ftpeng-update.cisco.com> <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB758B7A8@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local> <1B8E4C5A-D08B-4F37-B701-A39745136A33@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1B8E4C5A-D08B-4F37-B701-A39745136A33@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:40:57 -0000

On 2011-10-11 10:32, Fred Baker wrote:
> There is also an issue with PCP; it is currently a draft, and has not
> been sent to the IESG. Several operators have expressed some urgency
> for getting an RFC number on this so that they can include it in RFPs
> for managed routers. If we insert a normative reference to an
> internet draft, this cannot be published as an RFC until that draft
> is also published.

On this point: we already have consensus in BEHAVE to make PCP a
requirement for the CGN requirements draft, even though the situation is
pretty much the same (operators wanting to quote an RFC number in RFPs).
So there's precedent.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email