IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat

Victor Kuarsingh <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com> Fri, 17 February 2012 00:31 UTC

Return-Path: <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC8D21E8079 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:31:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p39ynAekJphP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:31:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C02621F874A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:31:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iagf6 with SMTP id f6so4277610iag.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:31:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NppeNi4zYgSXY9HbzwnDEUQkS+o2f8Vc7MkXzzMszEo=; b=GvPaYeA0pJoWTcv45FJUQMQmgiSQ5hvqxbuZdHF0HC5HH+if3cESJbue+6yPAsuAHL ZBdLZK6Q0gf6YtW8VXCJWiEzV4l/oKyGn9YMRgPlQA3k/7WTy5PlgvuALoV11ZDtI2DV jXjQYqojR2fMxp/rcUwLmmQjU6WSEdxUc0Ezg=
Received: by 10.42.177.133 with SMTP id bi5mr5483357icb.40.1329438665771; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:31:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.100.89] ([67.224.83.162]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l28sm13097018ibc.3.2012.02.16.16.31.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:31:05 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.0.0.100825
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:31:02 -0500
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
To: fred@cisco.com, v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <CB63056B.151D4%victor.kuarsingh@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat
In-Reply-To: <201202151455.q1FEt0K02883@ftpeng-update.cisco.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:31:10 -0000

Fred,

This work in my mind represents important work that should continue.
Putting a mobile operator hat on, it provides the last bit of functionally
to make IPv6 with NAT64 a real and workable option for Wireless
deployments based on known behaviours in commercially available product
(I.e. Infrequent, but need for IPv4 connections).

Given the content in the draft and testing/results provided thus far, it
appears to be a viable option with a number of benefits (especially in the
mobile space related to PCC complacence).

I would support this work in whichever forum (group) it should exist.

Regards,

Victor K



On 12-02-15 9:55 AM, "fred@cisco.com" <fred@cisco.com> wrote:

>
>A new draft has been posted, at
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-464xlat. Please take a look
>at it and comment.
>_______________________________________________
>v6ops mailing list
>v6ops@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email