Re: [v6ops] Re-evaluating RFC7934

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Tue, 28 September 2021 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98023A3563 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, MONEY_NOHTML=1.208, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=delong.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DFQz7w3590F5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB4A3A3555 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([IPv6:2620:0:930:0:7dcf:b62:e611:87db]) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 18SHK2fc1621336 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:20:02 -0700
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 owen.delong.com 18SHK2fc1621336
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=delong.com; s=mail; t=1632849602; bh=jF82TYN3jQcwu3BY3I2LaxYnwIwR6xccZ/Lo9RWiVs0=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=H6j+9+79uKI7J09/Tzk3C+xy0/eJcZy4PnNdCrM4xKLUW9LNM+YLoj91NOKt0WEZu bnDAwtZFzCcvU5xe5n8tepuDj0tkYtp1g8yHo+xr2YNaBOZaJ2wx5i6kI63au+2v0X 9WNB8XYeJjHlLnOsrYDQBdwU9kd6O6yEcxc2U4OM=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <9579b9bf-3e28-645d-cb33-cdea61036cc8@foobar.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:20:02 -0700
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <37F17875-418F-49E7-82A5-994B6C7183E9@delong.com>
References: <4527b90f-ed82-287c-29a9-8eb7f9079959@foobar.org> <CAKD1Yr1WKeWkorTxxvNAd=i+CBaY-akg0vC3zYRKWK3QN3W64A@mail.gmail.com> <9579b9bf-3e28-645d-cb33-cdea61036cc8@foobar.org>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930:0:0:0:200:2]); Tue, 28 Sep 2021 10:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ezmCbSXOMxjF_JCgIW1euoV1Isc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Re-evaluating RFC7934
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:20:22 -0000


> On Sep 28, 2021, at 06:14 , Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> 
> Lorenzo Colitti wrote on 28/09/2021 13:25:
>> If the administrator has decided that the host should not use multiple IP addresses, then IA_TA obviously can't be used.
> 
> So when someone is at work connecting to the company network, who needs to comply with whose policies?  Does the company abide by the employee's / user's policies, or the other way around?
> 
> Or take a more general case: if I rock up to a hosting/cloud provider or broadband access provider and instruct them that they're a great bunch of people, no really, but that they're obliged to comply with my network access policies for the set of products that they supply and I want to buy, how does that work out?

In my experience, it depends on how much of said product you want to buy.

For example, when Exodus was buying small Cisco devices by the dozens, Cisco didn’t really care what we had to say.

When we started ordering more than $5M/week in hardware, they started listening a lot more.

YMMV.

Owen