[v6ops] 6man/v6ops: DAD questions
Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Thu, 28 July 2022 14:35 UTC
Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1D2C13C530; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0SjBZW5JI20j; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:35:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FF28C159486; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 07:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F280058C4AF; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 16:35:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id E6D824EB5BD; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 16:35:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 16:35:23 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: ipv6@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <YuKeq/EfLv23SrTX@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/f1XRIXegPd6axZFqQI8PJ7IiwEY>
Subject: [v6ops] 6man/v6ops: DAD questions
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 14:35:35 -0000
Hey folks is anyone of you 6man/v6ops experts into the duplicate address detection algo and interested to have a chat with me about how to best reuse the algorithm for a new, application/UDP based instance to give each app running it a unique 32 bit identifier to use for other multicast stuff ? There are so much what looks like magic parameters that it would be lovely to get some insight into experienced performance and how to best reuse it. If anyone is still around here in Philly interested to help, pls. ping me! Cheers Toerless
- [v6ops] 6man/v6ops: DAD questions Toerless Eckert