IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report

james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com> Mon, 06 February 2012 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@apple.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD1C21F852B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:33:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.149, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cpr1tFT+junO for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530B621F870B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:33:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_VnKvTPWOIXrKfsk8cL78tQ)"
Received: from relay15.apple.com ([17.128.113.54]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTP id <0LYZ006NEI5TVL02@mail-out.apple.com> for v6ops@ietf.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:33:18 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11807136-b7cd6ae000007787-2f-4f301cedfac4
Received: from kallisti.apple.com (kallisti.apple.com [17.193.13.64]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay15.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 65.BB.30599.EEC103F4; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:33:18 -0800 (PST)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <CAKD1Yr3Cq7kj5RLW_ktEEs12NPA_-yNeSzstPiKeYY7Sv1FqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:33:17 -0800
Message-id: <C4E5FF0A-9FBA-465C-AB4B-8A1A62BAAD56@apple.com>
References: <CAD6AjGSRUdx32arseR26RzHNtMri8Vrif3dCQmuk7B52GmoHAw@mail.gmail.com> <FBD9BBC7-A537-4ABE-ABEB-76098F1BB415@cisco.com> <CAKD1Yr3Cq7kj5RLW_ktEEs12NPA_-yNeSzstPiKeYY7Sv1FqVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUieJDXQfedjIG/weT1hhbrT79jtDh9bC+z A5PHgk2lHkuW/GQKYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgyrj4rJWx4IF8xaMHz9kbGO9IdzFyckgImEh8 etDICGGLSVy4t56ti5GLQ0hgNpPE4oWdYAlhoKJHu7awgdi8AoYSM1+1s4LYzAIJEo+u9bKA 2GwCKhLfLt9l6mLk4OAUCJS48kEVJMwCFL75ZjIzRLmyxJ4H+9ghxthITF30hwli1zFGid/T loLtEhHQkHiw7jgTxEGyErcP7meawMg3C8nqWUhWQ9jaEssWvmaGsPUkXja9Y8cU15W4uG4S 4wJGtlWMgkWpOYmVhqZ6iQUFOal6yfm5mxhBQdpQaLaDccdfuUOMAhyMSjy8B7kN/IVYE8uK K3MPMUpwMCuJ8Ma90vcX4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xCjNwaIkzrtxFlBKID2xJDU7NbUgtQgm y8TBKdXAaPbkveKTvieVBtvzXn4/tnlJ4eOim/zbC8v/TAmcayFQHqPs8qH/2V0nhtdeIetS mpjWcXSnlizT3b145nuGj5yuyzQDbr/LebBYSq2j5b5HQMubtgU+HkYXRX8GzcxN12pn99U6 7zOHw47//e0zs3+HZourR95dsPh+9TLfrU831qSE9snMUWIpzkg01GIuKk4EAG8Td0BOAgAA
Cc: v6ops v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:33:20 -0000

On Feb 5, 2012, at 23:53 , Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> 
> As to which WG it belongs in, I don't know.

I would say that if there is a WG where this belongs, then it would be BEHAVE and not V6OPS.  I fail to see why this needs a working group to develop any further.  Wouldn't the individual submission track be more appropriate?


--
j h woodyatt <jhw@apple.com>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email