Re: [v6ops] Status of CLAT implementation on iPhone? (IPv4 apps on IPv6-only PDP type)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 23 February 2015 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2B61A1AC6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:12:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8TSlErT7_boL for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:12:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F221A1AB9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:12:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f182.google.com with SMTP id h15so18379319igd.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:12:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=nIIWGBBG2tK/4Na4mEzNe6n4rLBDIGoMpx2i/k4pxi4=; b=oagbaNkKgpIL81XA42OIkktTntw+T2b6g/CH9GDJZ8j3KlMhnSh1coR7pQA2+IQy8/ CNuy25xyoN4Ua1DbjSZTdyScehNjIJ2Omj97UkqBqe4xegUDREataevGyVTe6BlHH2fx c4mjkJB0jLuB9c2iEkglGd5UkaYAHZZxplbDVQGgyY1OF1EG1/35f67LBmE+X64st81W AxZuOf4Lse/T9qMF3Uxn3C2VosEsx3i/NLrRBh/m3kjxZ24Dc9KMa/ShBB98SoYYWVsb s3IW23K0Iy4Yky7qxecd9+A6TB7TvIlaUHUMo6E/9ans7kOxPKwT1cw3BnZotY8MvdjD ZG4A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=nIIWGBBG2tK/4Na4mEzNe6n4rLBDIGoMpx2i/k4pxi4=; b=ai7M3TcDhOy4AiAa+1RKWIVQOwdx5p5GpB3LXIB+ifB65kFSmHruTZ6l2KVT37Yd2F HB0/word2wyF6gNnhfPncopg20Tvpfq1NL231SvEpGuZKeK0xjiLda5D55GgGJp2CbhF 84koG18PRMW6c5OeEFX0rEFLcW5duTJDVShaTNWZxsvDUYT22lVRl201C5oo9IH8xtu4 qfBemhgmO3Q02dtewnxtSCT+GMy+55a/9UGTcIzaUBOgaGqNJQUQ7PlrJKxd2JfbWdtK HR5MOjLhkX48VEAOINtl/gnNxN2A5yt5H3ToTMLyLpAH3IHkfsxurOVDp7eCjkUmrmmm hn9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmTUBaWfekUsNLCvMgWuTA7aYEcNwMfh41QEc5vGbUegQ8Wn6K7jF1Lom1r9r2qJXku/EYn
X-Received: by 10.50.50.140 with SMTP id c12mr13060921igo.5.1424700733474; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:12:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.33.104 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:11:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54EB1F2F.4000604@gmail.com>
References: <54EB1F2F.4000604@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:11:53 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3P8mM80FuZBq0oKx9+AC5P0-NPdgWzGAtzT5yDnzRgbg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bdc117e218d97050fc1fd18
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/f7mYpvJnAVr-MxOPzF3iR1qG7b8>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Status of CLAT implementation on iPhone? (IPv4 apps on IPv6-only PDP type)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:12:15 -0000

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:38 PM, Alexandru Petrescu <
alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am asking because in private conversation I have noticed doubts about
> this being done.  Or, since the iPhone relies on a bsd derivative,
> it would be technically feasible to implement CLAT on it; it is nothing
> more than some iptables address translation plus a bit of python
> scripting in case.
>

They are also free to reuse existing implementations of clat, such as the
one that Android uses, which is BSD-licensed.