IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05: (with COMMENT)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 27 January 2021 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00483A0B9B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:37:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y1OJPDI3pXhX for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:37:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf31.google.com (mail-qv1-xf31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 427E03A0B3A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:37:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf31.google.com with SMTP id j4so1839697qvk.6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:37:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=9+uLjGA67zDr7ZQTvYh2V6MwjV0yLI0bXnhaEfsQ/Cw=; b=pgm+4wNWrq71SPh4dSQANlr9Wxet1JAVW4H+pAqYkimETRHRgK4b4YpFponHJobBVZ qDJfW13YZHhgDRzuRJrNeiKqarS70QUpZnLn29TErsUqE4Bzn6oFfcF1HMZX+0R8sczW 504vydTKAwkwVDjrSl5TeO9rXscEJpgG7pz6rwR59o/kTNHgNpRFzt0WYFz0/li/KAs3 XBOfheVrGaDbkcguXscIFJgf0ACnYFPb/M5x1BULk1hIuclEuUI5Z6AiDpaQ9RmdrWWz Qp/i3ICPdOeRqnwm8Yrtv6yx+hlzH60YqGt9hupTQDUZLGDin1DDtCf29HcW3yKCqvg7 vdBg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=9+uLjGA67zDr7ZQTvYh2V6MwjV0yLI0bXnhaEfsQ/Cw=; b=NqTx95Bp2Fmn420nQVbNxf5ELw6DcxoiFn0yEYvgsTDd1n+c7MpQMWBJdf3Lz1jpno omanUqXlw4L6dUpFBgc6XNJgG4mI9dtrtpaf4ejjumgY0+vW40CVjGJSc4tEiUDVVcZn DA/bsQFqAqNdOhKLNVT0FYc47IJOVsT9qPkaQZJ7646zWQNifd5mYpqdGFJUBHH6+5EZ 7zz1PiOw3fpRLEr9/3iGhenl9ybEN4rvV4lFyWl3BGPMp0KiR8eWwOhR5qsHy1WNZmpv ywE81ttKNFoYVMF7ejh8tFYv8C+b8by4pP1hE08S4clg8mNXIFUm4ewv/LhSVOyTItik M06w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530XvrTxILPXMAnJfH78oLwIvmtDx+M5ZElGAvDaNFmGjaLP6aaA e+XkX/qhNbzsd0eIzYHDE/BLeQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9mTo72ng/g2Y67Bf/U+z0HpHt9poYcVEc2ev/lTCi+wsTgwdz6kLhPMmKatSLnLVolrvmvA==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:8f09:: with SMTP id z9mr12274145qvd.25.1611783458218; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:37:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.4.75] (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v145sm2105474qka.27.2021.01.27.13.37.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 13:37:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <C68DC427-85A4-4AE7-928A-C92AD2C4488A@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F4ACCDDD-192E-4821-A7BC-058401B43973"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:37:36 -0500
In-Reply-To: <cf025acf-5192-d9a3-a727-8716d9d7b232@si6networks.com>
Cc: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, v6ops@ietf.org, draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum@ietf.org
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
References: <160325603610.17357.6914550111489766157@ietfa.amsl.com> <cf025acf-5192-d9a3-a727-8716d9d7b232@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/fUN8rM5HrYsnT7Ox6NBVx2mjjps>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:37:44 -0000

On Jan 27, 2021, at 4:21 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> What's the specific "text that is not appropriate for an abstract”?

The abstract should just say what topic the document covers and where it’s applicable. Anything more than that goes in the introduction. Otherwise you get these multi-paragraph abstracts that aren’t at all abstract, and don’t help the reader to decide whether or not to read the document.

Of course, usually you read the document because someone told you to, or because some other document references it, so maybe this isn’t that important… :)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email