IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Fri, 25 October 2019 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EB912004D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pvfJQ4trN2uR for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [91.239.96.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2F7B120043 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 11:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2804:431:c7f3:bff2:b8b3:4400:3123:ecb7] (unknown [IPv6:2804:431:c7f3:bff2:b8b3:4400:3123:ecb7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB67E86AD1; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 20:16:47 +0200 (CEST)
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-9@u-1.phicoh.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
References: <71621d5f-1525-98c0-aa94-281ac72a15cb@si6networks.com> <D329EEE8-B2F6-4A3C-9FA3-21B162F35156@employees.org>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Message-ID: <53acb2aa-0de6-f6d9-0166-16d89f00ed1a@si6networks.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:16:39 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D329EEE8-B2F6-4A3C-9FA3-21B162F35156@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/fhtznOJmu4dvwyz5W1483SdUFfE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 18:16:54 -0000

On 25/10/19 15:10, Ole Troan wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 25 Oct 2019, at 20:05, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
>>
>> When what you call "flash-renumbering" happens, 
> 
> Yes, because what you call “renumbering “ is not specified anywhere. 

THat's why we explain and describe it in our I-D.

-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email