Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient

[Ca By <[e-mail]>]

>
>
> > 2) Any solution that involves creating a negative customer experience
> (xyz website or abc app does not work), is a non-starter.  Please stop
> suggesting pain on paying customers, no network operator will do it. No
> appstore will do it (with teeth, in the near term)
>
> The way no major content provider wanted to turn IPv6 on.  Then they did
> for a day, and then they did it permanently.
>
>
I am fully open to the  next generation of iThingies  being IPv6-only
mandatory on all networks in the USA, this would achieve a lot in one
stroke.  The USA market is huge, and would shock the entire internet / web
/ apps into compliance "with this one weird trick."

The key is that a unified front is presented by all operators and enforced
by the owner of the ecosystem.  They can kill off IPv4 just like they
killed off Flash.  But, we cannot have free-riders that avoid the
requirement.

My honest opinion is that this alliance cannot be formed.  That said, mark
me as first in line for accepting this requirement if and only if all other
USA networks accept the requirement as well.


CB