Re: [v6ops] use of Teredo addresses in Apple devices

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 08:37 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B6F1A015F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RodPCHWFVnn6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x232.google.com (mail-yk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2E1F1A0130 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykdu72 with SMTP id u72so14418936ykd.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=YfYg73Sj7/XPBF3UaGUswWUSRIpwsESbXWpyWTYZ4kA=; b=YybXotAwA5n8+UWUIfc34cjuD2X4gIfA2YU7HCbkS7NzVUSeuqrdQNx2z6cF9U02/W wfH2Y2cHFcQ6eGpBiKctBCe3aKbFN6d6vR/QJdJcDEfB/c2YzukmwJTYvrqneVbuJIaF rTv6jBHgN6Z4uWWbyJPt1rzlX0GOTXZmJ6dBAl4LIg/NFEE4AlSHykv3mj26n0tT94xq 3hPzrhf3TiCGXC8jMVo5eHj0aQSU9ucAMTmlXhiBktzzWG5dPdNbZ5uPgppWzKx0urVU /JLR6EMbV45ziOoJ6JP4F1QSznAvorBGErpuI/zLJDMNZDVNrI9dk/+YWWc24h3/SxzG aEjA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=YfYg73Sj7/XPBF3UaGUswWUSRIpwsESbXWpyWTYZ4kA=; b=SleSpV60aSgaJChxM2Xrb22KjvGdt112YFMnbyPRoZdiRBKNeJ7wZjjG8qfHUlGF5q qOUg9j2/NAUKTwD+70ji3lLgAVXVQXceylUe30kTsn+IA45fzcyWq0kMTun7AoZfdvei ZNYRS7QL5411YyUiRnSJVEGUE/9u39U35bKnHByxCaBZSgHzdUIqBAHFNOkxFyOwKpGk z6MV9dEuOLBXe5A27xcN8LLfat0dr8wry2J87qnpkeZFSxy294iT0qODRHPCi2CsHdL4 78X7iHs4gRNrwQ2Tbd6rsdZLN6xPgicCFK3NyHR9LYxJVApSbQWKltUQ+yvHMRW2VewC xWWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlQEf9rn3yEKmt1Z3zUccLzlTJcnUwxTr+mPYJrQ3OWgqHAf/LwrO7Sgol5VsQDROjbPMUg
X-Received: by 10.129.75.214 with SMTP id y205mr14258981ywa.65.1437727064010; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.8.201 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 01:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61132A90D2D@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61132A90D2D@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:37:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3ED-0HOXNUWNeqcdx9cmBhQJDigzDjOryfiSLTG-rubg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f3d0aef9352051b9aeaf6
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/g6CXn-rT7qcwkOUz-pcasP-9088>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] use of Teredo addresses in Apple devices
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 08:37:46 -0000

I'm not sure that using ULAs is a good idea. ULAs are not likely to be
representative of real NAT64 deployments, which use global addresses.

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 10:24 AM, STARK, BARBARA H <bs7652@att.com> wrote:

> Great presentation on what Apple is doing to drive apps to implement IPv6.
> In thinking about use of the Teredo address space to advertise a prefix to
> tethered devices, I do have a concern. In many of my personal home
> networked devices, I've purposefully disabled Teredo and ISATAP and even
> put in some rules to prevent the devices from accepting such addresses.
>
> I think this would be a reasonable use of a ULA. A PI might be even
> better. I hear PIs are pretty easy to come by. The PI would have the
> advantage of being known to come from an Apple device for this NAT64
> purpose. That could help with trouble shooting.
> Barbara
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>