Re: [v6ops] Some stats on IPv6 fragments and EH filtering on the Internet

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Tue, 05 November 2013 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90AC11E81C7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:27:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kxfL6E6RPm99 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:27:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0DC11E817A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 09:27:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id D9A619C; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:27:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12339A; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:27:10 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 18:27:10 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <52792788.3070907@viagenie.ca>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1311051825040.26054@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <5278275C.50206@gont.com.ar> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1311050028410.26054@uplift.swm.pp.se> <52783535.9030200@si6networks.com> <20131105001243.53E28985D0D@rock.dv.isc.org> <527839C6.3000805@viagenie.ca> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D98318148100@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <F4AB804C-2C8E-40EF-ACE9-0A901E4F5122@employees.org> <52784DD1.7020106@gont.com.ar> <BD308F06-C9E2-42EB-9D23-CFD3432F1A1D@employees.org> <52785F34.6020606@si6networks.com> <A9F99218-AB14-45AA-B29D-7E1D7E4B93FC@employees.org> <5278E639.3040606@inex.ie> <C4864CA1-C8F4-45D6-944A-0E8BA073D4A7@employees.org> <5278E986.9050409@inex.ie> <C1BEE5D4-FDC2-4E4B-947D-CEC9E4F05E5D@employees.org> <5278EDAB.5030601@inex.ie> <52790CE7.6010506@gmail.com> <5279109F.80306@inex.ie> <52792788.3070907@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Some stats on IPv6 fragments and EH filtering on the Internet
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:27:20 -0000

On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Simon Perreault wrote:

> Won't they just disappear gradually, being replaced by newer boxes in 
> the normal course of events?
>
> Looks like a problem that will fix itself in time.

I agree. I think it's good that there is documentation on current 
behaviour seen in the wild, but also would be interesting to hear about 
testing with current generation devices and how they perform.

Perhaps time for a rfc6204 style document for certain aspects? :P

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se