IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Re: Dispatching Happy Eyeballs Version 3

Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-13@u-1.phicoh.com> Tue, 16 July 2024 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-b538D2F77@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9890CC15106F; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 02:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <tO6k980u3f29>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "Cc"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tO6k980u3f29; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 02:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo.hq.phicoh.net [IPv6:2a10:3781:2413:1:2a0:c9ff:fe9f:17a9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D33C5C151066; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 02:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305) (Smail #158) id m1sTeUw-0000MgC; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 11:29:26 +0200
Message-Id: <m1sTeUw-0000MgC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-13@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-b538D2F77@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <35C7852E-FF43-4600-BD93-B05DF82E3AF3@apple.com> <6E2B8558-CD88-4E26-AA6E-60978A886DB3@apple.com> <FB1ECCA9-0776-4928-955F-8EC22EEBE19E@consulintel.es> <BL1PR18MB42779FE990A919F054C3B4FAACA22@BL1PR18MB4277.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Jul 2024 00:58:41 +0000 ." <BL1PR18MB42779FE990A919F054C3B4FAACA22@BL1PR18MB4277.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 11:29:26 +0200
Message-ID-Hash: 4XO7PHWQ46SOUNJIEIAIT2RZDPKBFE4L
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4XO7PHWQ46SOUNJIEIAIT2RZDPKBFE4L
X-MailFrom: pch-b538D2F77@u-1.phicoh.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Jeremy Duncan <jduncan=40tachyondynamics.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Alldispatch@ietf.org" <Alldispatch@ietf.org>, "draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-v3@ietf.org" <draft-pauly-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-v3@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: Dispatching Happy Eyeballs Version 3
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/gZPFeVJwLKPCYZhe3DIqvFUaJos>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>

>    1000% agree here.
> 
> 
>    HE is masking IPv6 network problems we need to add some sort of
>    notification/alerting somewhere.

HE is typically embedded in end-user applications running on roaming client
devices.

In my opinion it would be wrong to have applications send reports about
client traffic to random third parties without the user's consent.

I think it is also unlikely that many people will of can give consent because
first they are not aware there is HE and second they don't understand what
it does of what they are consenting to.

So I would suggest that we don't go too far in this rabbit hole.

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status