Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call- "harmfully broad"?

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 19 February 2015 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B281A8A75 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 02:20:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c7w3qVIgzj9X for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 02:20:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com (mail-ig0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD6D61A8A44 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 02:20:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hn18so42931217igb.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 02:20:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=UitTqFGB/qBts3AMBlUq1bOAsmYj5KZ4KVoiAUf+XGQ=; b=K5IfRl7hiZAAOac237JoEPpmAQ9UWIfhLPhqMpOZ1CbLgf6HR6TrUR0DFPnOoVrTJm DCN//4jKTOGXnAS9fbTeDIfYMNGmLkUgWkOXeC8JtuLQ+AhaJNDnecSoQDJXWzhLtWis Mk5BGncVRITIXAfwvaBTTODdznTDZ/E5S+sE2lBGfu198p6a1AzbJsTRwIekyzDcSMow FIMLvwSKxQIZyl2XQ7I3y5/NyFwMuPxymk+RMIFwy1czUZVv7rlkS9UR8X379yAo9nnv cWj4d171N3M+2Hcam26UQ/6SFNEgcqTOrtXBEYazNYyFXT5L0m/rLKBn6EsZ8xa/s2r0 gfug==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=UitTqFGB/qBts3AMBlUq1bOAsmYj5KZ4KVoiAUf+XGQ=; b=SpZSV5ZzkUCVOA3zuyMbz0xTxYxmPnk3wVevHqGHl3q/4uGyt4KayE+3yTGpjZv8Gt r9tJOrOitO7ZnukZgSi642tWxOOYRTglDVY3yT5eTnWAbXzPVZkTZrl/9brDtV4iyomg Hm6TNiOmhM3u7C5RECZUBeRZWY/TZMZBY3VrPsH/pcpOn/bPU3m+frpK1dPYIENxQZra EYaaZPYVNSc1/GFRlN/h86CL9gYFTmDo3ED4t8CucTtHOYmYkUfhy6VZuqnTDyFEnckP jV4GO2cMI9E+XkXBeOelH0FSMFUt9K7nKLwjZ5pPwQQQjUGhEdUreA03DtPRRNUoQeXV g7rg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl/v5KSj1sg0gwk0Q6YRipkGthebbyZtAhxmpR1NC/GEPk30LrxjdDOJY+b7sHyDiIt1uvn
X-Received: by 10.42.138.199 with SMTP id d7mr5099374icu.3.1424341203026; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 02:20:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.33.104 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 02:19:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303E097FB@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK>
References: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330049091C2@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAKD1Yr2yDnwPDHgsq3Wi3UOzKY7KrqSpBMbBttJ5qAAu6ijOAw@mail.gmail.com> <54DDF02C.8020903@gmail.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E61130F231B4@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303DEA706@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <CAKD1Yr0j23E-UMdL2Ujv5nrpbbUa9rgPE_6AhbHLn0JeOZ9Edg@mail.gmail.com> <355A1FFC-9F92-4D61-985D-4C5FC6EC69EC@eircom.net> <CAKD1Yr2PX81czTwUZzaMtgPc9vhvP=oL++UZByGzxmkq_B=DMA@mail.gmail.com> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303E07EE2@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <CAKD1Yr0Zkic6-ydV-u==xjDGdY9GYWb8KwciBPnfk8zO=6FFqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0qS-Vg-XB7mNWwephkkL5rCG+NJO7uDJg_4W3LT+Q9Ew@mail.gmail.com> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303E088AE@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <CAKD1Yr00Ri8hQMsJcSqMAw+g_T-mU8GxG1G8rTHgo=McaKdW8Q@mail.gmail.com> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303E08E9C@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300490D690@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAD6AjGQ_K2kJCfFbhUxHK4p_5UXAsRpgoeYNtcbg4D+dOq5_4Q@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93300490DAE5@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303E097FB@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:19:42 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr38vF3TKHjKY7zyUBS78B7G6-MCy=57f8aF-tjuk30A4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Heatley, Nick" <nick.heatley@ee.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba1efc1272559d050f6e479d
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/g_mhlNvBkzuRJlWmcy9ZQX4QTsg>
Cc: "IPv6 Ops WG \(v6ops@ietf.org\)" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call- "harmfully broad"?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:20:05 -0000

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Heatley, Nick <nick.heatley@ee.co.uk>
wrote:

>  If another body could be accountable for the document, that it
> represents the views of a suitable collective (mobile operators), but the
> technical content was filtered via IETF, that would be ideal, no?
>
> I have no idea how to engineer such an outcome, but if it could be done
> then this work should not be wasted – could be a “GSMA sponsored RFC”?
>

You could make it an independent submission, and say that it represents the
recommendations of the authors (see RFC 4846 for a description of the
process, or RFC 6732 for an example of such an independent submission RFC).

If what you're after is IETF expertise, then I think the document has had
plenty of exposure to that already, given it's been in the WG for over a
year and a half.