IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Inviting discussion: draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 19 February 2015 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3F41A0193 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:54:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YBxGmD_A3snk for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:54:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650B01A01E7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:54:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=407; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1424379288; x=1425588888; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=1l5xqpp2Y1tX+jXT/kGJZTXk54Qr24/Ra/lzQUL1xGo=; b=LAOzoO3nkTGQoehlX3qTl63BN+K9UlWQb2w8ol5iImXOA6XwaPUkyEtS Qei3Fc9T+V3pTLcIG3qNQOrQA5Mrk6uKSEHrZfztiVpkEeGTYeUIfqg97 Dagm9edirwPXXkm06RxybI38KuNB4f2EtHqpKU9pm56bhKeolw+5lZfaB 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AKBQCMTOZU/5xdJa1bgwZSXsJqhXECgSNDAQEBAQEBfIQRAQQ6UQEqFEImAQQbiCcNrDCnawEBAQEBBQEBAQEBAQEXBI9Mg06BFAWPS4NcmQcig26CM38BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,610,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="125126351"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2015 20:54:47 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com [173.36.12.82]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t1JKslOZ017575 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:54:47 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.149]) by xhc-aln-x08.cisco.com ([173.36.12.82]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:54:47 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Inviting discussion: draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes
Thread-Index: AdBMhkuz1K4mXfjaRUCGq1D03OjIJg==
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:54:47 +0000
Message-ID: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B0612B394@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.116]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/gaMQ_DUmEG2OMalKAHjbQkhkkTI>
Subject: [v6ops] Inviting discussion: draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 20:54:50 -0000

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes
  "Considerations for Running Multiple IPv6 Prefixes", Bing Liu, Sheng
  Jiang, Yang Bo, 2014-10-11,

This draft was prepared for IETF 91, but didn't get discussed in part because a number of Chinese participants didn't make it to Honolulu for a Monday meeting. Is there interest in discussing it at IETF 92?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email