Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 30 September 2021 08:06 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A47C3A010D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -18.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.499, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Mr-JCbrkUHH for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:06:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD3673A0100 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id d26so8552794wrb.6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WJH79mN+Hse6yLVtOBD8LCOdsHcgHrtzS3fI1iwC6Q4=; b=N2nrBGup4S/acHSpQ/6mTVToQ+erU8HzsZqw3m4RoTj2vAas8ES0h1RYc7Y7TZ5QP0 CwAT+6dwotaJxBDuamHv1dF07pUMzxYHBWz2Y/XBk7tUdc6ZQCuu7eBE1iNg4K3wEIn0 snkaI1ArB1eS3z1uQ8IcrAyoxrHRPAEXA3l7ZeneM2XNLHLiVl8TvLOwEkoIV9KX6g1J 3raeHQA80K5VzGV8QlZjH09Z7GNAFQ38EsXBvFlVX3hYn6Eve5LQGpQaax64NK6aif0K 4+eVbpo6BMjgB7mnWirKCw9HNoM8G4Yd325cUwwsZCCKd7D4J3UbulVONroIvDhxoRb0 N45g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WJH79mN+Hse6yLVtOBD8LCOdsHcgHrtzS3fI1iwC6Q4=; b=uneRLU/bfux7chUB3M47Rah25KyWtZRvpcfFRMSVF+tdEtg2iqAF2CyA/m0b+jzSjo M5a8zAABZVhCXiQFJ80YFsNqfezspx1fQo6aO4t0JdCGfEG0aKs2LUxIA/WD9mFwitYQ y18foiruIf/JkbDlmeK3QYceiyEtG3FSeqwhPVfuK9As3G6XK4B0xKEfCfFlYIDwuZD1 CHpBiwP8XVlcHv/3wFoYaDtJz9pYWjrK1wPiCthMAjCPu/YyOqMffudrtEwcjnQybosE ziyeTL8xSmpnb3Koe7hQN3BozZxM79JClUEjyLsa2qURtq1A7TthZaj9QKyjmHBWeVuN 8Ehw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533YiyYueIZ5N71XfCh+kpL1ZdR9cyfbdnRAB39gJx3tkMD8tHhI dvwIQiMwjcQW0tOOrSaWEhE/6aW6u2OlGjtsbfQ8Yg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGtL6LBD8zZjXXpDoAyWSNFd3WgQT2YYt+TraufXEru82ClzqMppQKxS3AZul8T2g9D8L1ih8MStGh77US5y4=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:8d:: with SMTP id m13mr4610287wrx.109.1632989162589; Thu, 30 Sep 2021 01:06:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DDA36020-90CC-471B-83AD-3D98950F1164@delong.com> <CAO42Z2wdoSdJDOB2Zo0=ZK0ecOARRsdg2nbHZGSDOhryPbLfDw@mail.gmail.com> <F2BD0A42-E9AD-45DD-999A-638E73BE1177@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr2K3Gd3JD=NJFOoH6GYgs-8ACxRQB9-sKJ7cbF4_hxsow@mail.gmail.com> <0B533C71-5DB0-410D-A5A3-7E8FD559F214@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr3NoYfNT7+OVJoCCdgdif6AHHw29tNCPttS=-NuRZKv3w@mail.gmail.com> <5FAD5290-3616-4194-B783-D473DB38A89A@delong.com> <m1mVGC6-0000HSC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <D6620D7C-8FE8-4294-8014-AB18A230C9C7@delong.com> <m1mVItl-0000GuC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <YVN6/cA6Ob3vLJQH@Space.Net> <m1mVK32-0000HpC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAO42Z2zQys6o41+m1iX1Mm88M7CaUdQa1C+uuYqxz2STfcwt_Q@mail.gmail.com> <d2887464-19d7-da09-d6f6-51ddc0e9ca45@foobar.org> <CAO42Z2w=BVoy-EmkM+x=8bVJc8WAcwRyLrdpsOAxu-as3ed6ZQ@mail.gmail.com> <5C6472D8-EA2E-4F4F-9DBD-2484277284F9@delong.com> <CAKD1Yr3eqCGCw_ruGSFyPq6t1iezqXpsnNeGcfjT0pV_b8-UTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CC5C7DAB-378D-4160-BBCE-2C8E2E4C108F@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <CC5C7DAB-378D-4160-BBCE-2C8E2E4C108F@delong.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 17:05:50 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0vYEyRYJ-HwqRGddCdxvavmryvkpRYmVVFsuChUcuirA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen=40delong.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f5c03d05cd31eabf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ghNeJXhN8gtkYoOXEwbVtEklubE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:06:11 -0000

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 4:53 PM Owen DeLong <owen=
40delong.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Further bottom line, appeasing the environments that want this will not
> cause the vast majority
> of other environments to suddenly run DHCPv6 in preference to SLAAC. Where
> SLAAC meets the
> need, nobody is going to go to the trouble of implementing a DHCPv6 server.
>

Actually it will be the opposite. Everybody in the industry knows DHCP and
understands the pull/refresh model. In the absence of a counterweight, that
model will end up being used everywhere. In my experience, folks suggest
disabling SLAAC at the first sign of problems caused by the operator
assuming the pull model... unless disabling SLAAC it breaks some real
functionality. I've seen this happen quite often, for many reasons (driver
bugs, firmware bugs, wireless controller bugs, etc).