From nobody Thu Oct 22 08:54:42 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2E83A00D9 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:54:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qN9dMM5nB_j9 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:54:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AF5E3A00D2 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:54:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id h6so2891949lfj.3 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:54:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lq4ZaH3UuTFieq1FCRHGcFznOXuCSr+2EiB/02SoTy0=; b=p6507q3qwfIMLHTcUj+p6tr88fOvVU0z0F8hZo/LO57FN7X7p5D9iZoMgjiJBcuNeC /LeazhIVGQAWkit/IOZwJ18qdiZeKjWZYlC1rLswW0q8VQNjiV3VscyaOSBZZP9wrQvw 5LscMZm/U+Ysm+ztWG5OPNOYCA34YMZ8MC7aAxrjSkWap6+W2BsXS0L5i5qMNJCKs9c1 Zn5KtzbrRwGJZcGeqXT0VLx2n9zT2SZSycY7JQeO34lXtcnyQccgPQLWuS7Symq9TB1c Lea3bmiYA5ArghU9xlmw+QLUSUgyTN1UuAkAQy77RcvtJjxrhKaIljP3n070hH5KzamG Apsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lq4ZaH3UuTFieq1FCRHGcFznOXuCSr+2EiB/02SoTy0=; b=g0VpHY8NZLv9XC/gACM9z/eCHxk4o+nd0lQfffPcR2II39SsgNWC3xa0FvNawkmS6z 6yYsn1x5JA0u5uuGLTJBUFnwH2LVR5I/DPwkOHjiU0t9bFA2omxAleRoA6gE3oMmLFuW 7kdGsFvv0F7OpiohBxSknSDuecVhTWyXTCgbjqNW6imZdWdm6+F63v3W9TTL0xnXXgyf ungDxl3Ae/cYkuZhtm7oeWdfTDzisSBZPRgCzyov72BH7f1dh02CtWQyJCxxR8nYR0kx t511NHSU6Ik85bN8W5EswWGcKfQaPyypMUTfEFWIFXBzuLydX946BAAOeIajVWb4A11E StNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5326sT7mWtQXK/cMp/zeGqMdD/tgo0Tt1TdqEI86JQbtRTeexaMD SRRkNKem8vSmg2/MToFRRC+ZTA8J8rHGSDGGPfXrZmeYgcQ89gHj X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzZ9iBhQQjZOozfyih9NzKhEvmmq2SbtfcPSMjfMKw5OoXSl3kAGjqJjOJevHa/wtA+TCCQRHnwxynZOSoha+8= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5dd5:: with SMTP id x21mr1023617lfq.41.1603382075674; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 08:54:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Warren Kumari Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:53:59 -0400 Message-ID: To: IPv6 Operations , Fernando Gont , "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Archived-At: Subject: [v6ops] Disposition of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05 X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: v6ops discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:54:41 -0000 Hi all, draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05 was on today's telechat, and ran into issues. Alissa (based on the Gen ART review) asked why this was not a BCP, and there was general agreement within the IESG that BCP seems like most reasonable status. There was also discussions on the: "Take careful note: Unlike other IETF documents, the key words "MUST", [...] "OPTIONAL" in this document are not used as described in [RFC2119]." and that this was very confusing. I proposed that we change the status to BCP, and that the terms be used in the normal manner. I'd like to give the WG 2 weeks to object to this proposal, and, if none received, start another IETF LC as BCP. So, please let me know (by Nov 5th) if you strongly object to this becoming a BCP, and the "normal" RFC2119/BCP14 meanings being used for the recommendations **in this document**. W -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf