IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-v6ops-hbh-05

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Wed, 22 November 2023 10:41 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64623C14CE31 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 02:41:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75iIL3rcWQAM for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 02:41:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AD0EC14CE2B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 02:41:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from crumpet.local (unknown [89.101.70.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.netability.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 151C79CC0E; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 10:41:40 +0000 (GMT)
To: "Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping@huawei.com>
Cc: Xipengxiao <xipengxiao=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <1d22666296d545a7b36898adf300c700@huawei.com> <a8530e08-93d7-e7ce-526f-6a7066663eb1@foobar.org> <14aeaa37e9c44e628f701f47515fb463@huawei.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <03b3a701-b844-b2f1-6116-a5d784be2810@foobar.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 10:41:38 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.60
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <14aeaa37e9c44e628f701f47515fb463@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/hCUBkI3ScKVPtOOlT1TUf5yT1fk>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-v6ops-hbh-05
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 10:41:49 -0000

Hi Shuping,

I read your previous response, and waited for a document update which 
happened a number of weeks later. The only change between -03 and -04 
was to introduce a reference to rfc9098:

https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=draft-ietf-v6ops-hbh-03&doc_2=draft-ietf-v6ops-hbh-04

This change, and your email don't address any of the structural issues 
in draft-ietf-v6ops-hbh, and all of the items are still essentially 
outstanding.

Nick

Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) wrote on 02/11/2023 01:40:
> Hi Nick,
> 
> Please find our last response to your comments. You did not reply back, so we believe that your concerns have been resolved.
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Oc1ubq5gmIRO6ctzzmescCrYL3k/
> 
> Best Regards,
> Shuping
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Nick Hilliard
> Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 10:51 PM
> To: Xipengxiao <xipengxiao=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-v6ops-hbh-05
> 
> Xipengxiao wrote on 01/11/2023 14:40:
>> Because 6man has issued WGLC for draft-ietf-6man-hbh-processing, this
>> message starts the WGLC for its companion draft-ietf-v6ops-hbh-05
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-hbh/>. Because next
>> week is IETF 118, to allow sufficient time for people to review and
>> comment, the WGLC will end on Nov 22.  Thank you.
> 
> I've made a number of comments on various versions of this ID, but none of the concerns I've raised have been addressed adequately by the document authors. On this basis, I don't believe that this document should be published as an RFC.
> 
> Nick
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.40.4 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status