IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IETF Working Group Agenda Analysis

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 16 October 2019 05:45 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D783712006F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OfsI4ZBnBZd7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D732120048 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id p12so4252012pgn.6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=WK/Z8URxcGRY5Wpps15qKOmgj+nhZy2oTFWc0PMhOLg=; b=tyjxBA6vkwbTLOuMyr3xGi8mQIaDN9FwXcvnqb8Veh2gixD6jUrq8FyznHzkprjLfw VA1dVigNUoHlkiIV7x2JEGnNL2fMJXzOt1nWrIKuLXtJDz+0SjsVcErw+jGaZWgwiV8l CsUwGqIyO7GhAwY5K7CHIKQVoLbE1fQc6NEjAiVdKipsDAhBwJ6L02Z9KQ48YBZrD4+j J7CBmuwAnKyHiQqEfkizUG70mhRSMnbyYa+2oKAIJ+pTvFGnKExbkZHpBxRbR7YCCedo jXhJIg0fDsQe9yBP3QfIY6/NEBHp49ZSRF0zXlkD9D2WZBCbFgc46I1H/as/JkiWukHm UuBg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=WK/Z8URxcGRY5Wpps15qKOmgj+nhZy2oTFWc0PMhOLg=; b=aDYwLeibzyyxEbkrr8yPKV22iTDz7My3Vswq+jX6ltQG6kXq4+MqqbuxgrOxF7FtJA K5QUGaUUAF337pe3iIjCBDQRk638ERY8+yo2A+DYS1PD1JSVBWN/FXdNIWkHmJM6kum9 tYse6JbdJ5BHywsS/BUa3LU2KN4SNjcneQxOlZjOKAi5HystIt66ynOn+8vMn7YVQ0Ah gf6t80Sqx7xpIRwm5oGqa/DjNZ65YALY3+h1c8ZuQ5NOdmrwOO/+4wXiImBGBTg2j3dK OXV6NdEefeF3Qpnxjr4PGpDuPYtWDit99IRFkSHpkJ5KUwZk4Eis6M++8hEwhfCC6sIH ar6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVFlFbRplKLMlNK5jkx83ek6nizabqAtOuJbAhNm0ZS+QOILsQu g5lP0C0gafdyrRCts5bp8NvfSe1a
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwAgwXP9tWA7aUCoMtIp6QshzfloPDf7YzVi83R7PdG0o9YfXwT8Dxrmj1jdkjdlgel02viCg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:fe56:: with SMTP id x22mr43020691pgj.282.1571204703966; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (ip70-185-147-118.sb.sd.cox.net. [70.185.147.118]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z21sm22319846pfa.119.2019.10.15.22.45.02 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e7c533ef-06f7-6853-1218-34c1b0b26dc3@hit.bme.hu>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 22:45:01 -0700
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <273D84A2-04D1-4BD7-87E6-7646C95D8955@gmail.com>
References: <EA749954-7FC2-4DA8-9172-07BF4CDB9761@gmail.com> <e7c533ef-06f7-6853-1218-34c1b0b26dc3@hit.bme.hu>
To: Gábor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/hHCzS6JMZ69gpX2XUeF2KXSP6cQ>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IETF Working Group Agenda Analysis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:45:08 -0000

Looking forward to the update and the results.

> On Oct 15, 2019, at 12:06 PM, Gábor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu> wrote:
> 
> Dear Fred,
> 
> Thank you for taking care for all drafts, including our one:
> 
>>> 2019-07-06	draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison (tracker) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison> (HTML) <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison> (thread) <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a&q=%22draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison%22> (diffs) <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-03.txt>
> 
> Unfortunately I cannot promise a significant update until the cut date of IETF 106. However, I do not want to abandon it at all, and I plan to add a section about the performance analysis of the 5 IPv4aaS technologies according to the methodology described in RFC 8219.
> 
> Although our results are not visible yet, several people are working on this topic. When I was in Japan, I did SIIT (also called stateless NAT64) performance measurements, by which I tested the feasibility of the benchmarking methodology described in RFC 8219. Unfortunately, the DPDK based measurement program written by my PhD student proved to be completely unusable, and though I could do some quick fix and I could use it in a limited way, I decided to completely re-implement it. Now, I am very close to finish it and release siitperf as a free software.
> 
> Since September, I have an MSc student, who is working on an RFC 8219 compliant DS-Lite Tester. He has experience in DPDK, and I hope that he can do it in one semester. (Perhaps, he will extend his tester for the other technologies in the next semester, but it is his decision, if he is willing to do so.)
> 
> I also have two new PhD students: one of them focuses on the comparison of the 5 IPv4aaS technologies in several aspects, and the other one deals with the security issues of IPv6 transition technologies.
> 
> So even slowly, but we are progressing. I plan to include some of our results into our draft before IETF 107.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Gábor
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email