IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-hilliard-v6ops-host-addr-update-00.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 20 July 2017 11:28 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D66131C0C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ifcX9LddEz3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x230.google.com (mail-pg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3DD612EC30 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x230.google.com with SMTP id s4so13545752pgr.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VQWkB8avPGKA6PUUjzSUWauoctGVIoX6vvIS3XmSJp0=; b=a31ckzJhvSupp37pa1Sqx49CWMgscdRswm4iWcPVHxuLe4PcuL+fq4fWyEwDf24vFq 5NXyI50BCfutoba6F6hvVqQwakxY8q+CWnqfupc1gVT9C40N1936UMvmhp7J2wEUi0pY gfNpNvqecbbTGRDYWSwEwLC9+AEuaD9KN/QQHZgTqI1kcu3sM3wPXhlkcrsgWrJiuPHU ed72QF+/pL9G7tlb7KKmI2l9pwwWzCDB2gWqZ33ccAGPd0m0nGzGblitxswOY7Xkb+2n omuK5YGjqro0HWMas+QFYFDu7WtSeWWT8q19qOB3QyuViq3Nbly1sLNQ9sBgGIiBiPJo YCWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VQWkB8avPGKA6PUUjzSUWauoctGVIoX6vvIS3XmSJp0=; b=g4XNoqc9wUJQwYtxZXMlS/z8TRBPMe412otA7NDfIOwinxHllGFKJSdWCabdEharnK I6s+oR2eQHuabNttwn0TExWesZHp21HfsjfXY2GT9uzWTR4iYcL8aubiA0FSqzfHVu44 zG/kndObHrmipx0AB37ykUvhK/CKbJRBlA12k/wul1cnjfxaJIJtaPUDM6cFrHdBuSiF oaIoxUT3fSpF5rGdTiLU0HEE3180YN2NOjlUvAe+9Aj8hXpvF8PO6krb250es/57ZzNc d+0K42gjjoyiMahncjS7oW/8fTj9k5eQLiONyS5xsy2E+1RVJApJLx1Ebpngz9NJ/vdZ 4NAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111z2OQ2mYawJKrs4MJYLByVL8RLjhiCfOomrVvoFw9payVNdgdX HSnPjNLtJGAbAsK7Jn5vr8vkEjYrtFyz
X-Received: by 10.99.44.66 with SMTP id s63mr3571695pgs.302.1500550104426; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.181.42 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.181.42 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DBD3B89@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <596CF817.8040900@foobar.org> <BC0BBAF5-B016-44B5-8D73-BC9382CB79A9@google.com> <20170719090835.GC45648@Space.Net> <CAKD1Yr29MmGJuX+uhXaroB6UMRBBWBscCZPaMjaVscL0q7a7pg@mail.gmail.com> <20170720062428.GK45648@Space.Net> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DBD3B89@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:28:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1n2YEkOEu3-wb58Xc_sq9hSstf75+umvHA7hmenP5P0bQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>
Cc: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e48bcf142850554be0bc2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/hSAAaZQzHSupEcJSEtB4kPJgURg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-hilliard-v6ops-host-addr-update-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:28:27 -0000

And, at the moment, it is not precluded, right?

On Jul 20, 2017 1:25 PM, "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com> wrote:

> > Since there is no reason to deploy both IA_NA/IA_TA *and* SLAAC, it
> > effectively *is*, and no amount of word-weaseling is going to change
> this.
>
> I've spoken to various ISPs who want to deploy their IPTV STBs or home
> automation devices, in conjunction with their CE routers, in such a way
> that the STBs and home automation devices do both SLAAC and DHCPv6. The
> STBs/etc devices automatically request IA_NA without caring about values of
> bits in an RA (because M=0 may be used in RAs to prevent other devices from
> asking). The DHCPv6 server in the ISP CE router recognizes the ISP's host
> devices and provides them (and only them) with DHCPv6 IA_NA addresses.
> Those addresses are used specifically to access the ISP service. For
> communicating with other devices on the LAN or other Internet services,
> SLAAC addresses are used.
>
> I think this is a perfectly valid use case. There is no reason to preclude
> it. I don't see privacy implications. The ISP services don't tend to be
> delivered over "the Internet". The devices don't roam.
> Barbara
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email