IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-04

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Mon, 18 June 2018 08:47 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97171277D2; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ANI9o8RRd9Ma; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 771D61277C8; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id a13-v6so3277375lfk.12; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7HMSW4SYfoHcionizx72xH1p+jPxKvUgxsZGN1t9Apc=; b=mgnQazl0NCQbsCh6iPvYHe1FUJBC4TcP0dtWcPjAT0kRLX+AoMnnWB3q9t/6tPKnj6 J3KEJXru2nbrhMvWgOxn92cATSmcyaoiBKwj7JdCyM3t5rdvhmbuPbnc4k0WPHg0ev0c yZfy1hacW+rgv69WoYbjk0IbgYXtHvcA54agnkhu981Z3JTU5MEhpRjaov06radIgpJj V1t14r9KcEMOCrMnUkWO3j/F7fjkmR1y1uFGHeKf7eueRwV4ZLl6GZkQwvS0BVxCMrUL hS3t0Io0VjgNWKV0CHgQExvEoIacz4/kg8IKgl8GOIBKDP0PBM+I/jtuqy71o36WQ6Of yrSQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7HMSW4SYfoHcionizx72xH1p+jPxKvUgxsZGN1t9Apc=; b=snbdfuk8UFCL+s0sH5DcE9v5kAB72629ft3iyzif85a+5huvwnVETIBDjQDxjw+YZE GyWXb67kTyDP8chpmiJCWFBeQusfNvxAHkskWudgA/TBxxirjBGdNVINSUyAQJyWtgP7 YNu+fOpe9wO3IKM6M4kUAq8RijEvvrfbwBfpdhT63u90zeWAp1FjYTrl3T8BLH+ZRYMr kJZyV7MBD2xLWQ++5Elze4VqQwPucZwwqRJnpyjFz60vymjH1uLJvzZTnOmXzeI9CUH+ 4f3CF4MzWGMGKNTk+qCtiLBn1bFL0jMmy2P7CvqEzhOp893W1I0e4D2oNbdq7tdWdwku hZyw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E065iL3uPrqlYw+GUinpWVdOW8LVUQE4X/OBlSbrhKwXKA0rIxP fkdIOuCc9Nq0sJDSh1jqr7uMN+po5nIRDjHbjOYNjIOm
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKIa2BRy+unoZFi/g7kYT+mbtJhhj9EAdztb5ZRmjmuXSxjjOuigE0naEe+goJVirI82eefpGA6zBxinTc2O7+A=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:28b:: with SMTP id y11-v6mr7319087lje.27.1529311664538; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a19:1dd0:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 01:47:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <152689102802.23045.6041887435563645658@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <152689102802.23045.6041887435563645658@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 18:47:23 +1000
Message-ID: <CAFU7BARE6ud0io_5SSA670z6B=cqHJ3=SEqYHd+r7pzArTbGkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras.all@ietf.org, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/hhAyx08nUMsU8QYV5JSUNLgSi0k>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-04
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:47:48 -0000

Hi Sheng,

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com> wrote:
> Review result: Has Issues
> Minor issue: There are many unused reference. However, they are not simple Nits
> and cannot be fixed by deleting them from reference list. Many of these unused
> reference are really relevant and should have some content to describe the
> relationship with the mechanism or scenario of the document, such as RFC6296
> NAT66, etc.

I've checked all unused references and added most of them to the draft
text. However some of them had to be removed as they are more relevant
to the general multihoming discussion and other potential solutions to
that problem, which are discussed in the
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming
(see Section 7 of that doc). Using SLAAC vs NAT etc is discussed in
details there.

As draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras is more about applying the
approach defined in draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming to the
particular subset of use cases, it seems unnecessary to have the same
text in both documents, especially as draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras
explicitly refers to draft-ietf-rtgwg-enterprise-pa-multihoming for
details explanation why the particular mechanism is proposed.

Please let me know if the updated version does not address your concerns!

Thank you!

-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email