Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Fri, 15 October 2021 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@space.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640533A097D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:12:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=space.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oqfY3yZ6Jbgb for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper1-relay.space.net (gatekeeper1-relay.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:3:85::38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A43393A096E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 11:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=space.net; i=@space.net; q=dns/txt; s=esa; t=1634321552; x=1665857552; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=WGoKcyun3wWWD2e90zLta8WAkx67sURho1DuJIknr7M=; b=hxyKj5P2pVqqWzltCMIuS2N2O38aGXExM+fl8FKrUhgHHRwayx1TbhYD bp5oqjuDBguXyNdyiFaU3o32avYfQY6tNu7uBY3TgpBIlppQ9w75bifxZ ZhGG6LoJ6H530+d2lhMc5wFkvNfehptp/SS444QELWxmiiVRCOkOSRvWC +Qw99MDSo6GSd8mrjQId1xxMi0pzMz7k+UihORC/S1vSQCegyUSr8GxvJ jNRnLwfyL8kYPG6gy78Cdqph1JZ/e/RvvXGC8abTC2XHKuTaXws3Sv9K2 rvNoHRWVMabVwLjBI3OIyctVgKoaCHIifOdCnorafhh0vhjnhVYPC6kAg g==;
X-SpaceNet-SBRS: None
Received: from mobil.space.net ([195.30.115.67]) by gatekeeper1-relay.space.net with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Oct 2021 20:12:28 +0200
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943AA41202 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:12:28 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius4.space.net (moebius4.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::251]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4AE40EC4; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:12:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by moebius4.space.net (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 4504D21B01; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:12:28 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:12:28 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, Owen DeLong <owen=40delong.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Message-ID: <YWnEjEcNo+M4tLAO@Space.Net>
References: <CAPt1N1=wcJN+ucPR0x7NuG6DYk=Z6zdPEMSSg8L3GkE90-16KA@mail.gmail.com> <4577684E-FF06-4C48-B70A-FA832D28BE02@employees.org> <CAPt1N1kkHDheKVzPgCOR7u-Nix2d79A6tB-SQZ+cj3ZjV3Tx4A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1kkHDheKVzPgCOR7u-Nix2d79A6tB-SQZ+cj3ZjV3Tx4A@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/hpWupRt38Htnafu_CZ9hFuO5tb8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 18:12:39 -0000

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 02:03:30PM -0400, Ted Lemon wrote:
> That said, we're comparing apples to oranges here. On a home network, the
> operator is /never/ going to configure DHCPv6. 

DHCPv6-PD, for sure.

Why shouldn't he?  IETF told operators and vendors that this is a good
thing if you have router-behind-router in the home.

If you are speaking about "subnet per device", this is not IA_NA/TA but PD.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279