[v6ops] Working Group Status
"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 23 January 2014 17:59 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20DF1A0040 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:59:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.036
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.036 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i1xLLBSLWJwz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:59:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601581A002F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:59:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3132; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1390499986; x=1391709586; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=3euAbA34e1TGqOFbkQ4NOUHkiPh9JQV1s443mLb49pE=; b=eqvGdzGyeTnlBs5GB3sVRzVgoZbMvIgfOGCp+CF110M4XXWt0h1bLder PCRFynFRIo4EQDDyEGlbYu3rRk1KaJjCRDI2lzTGYvMcHPYKtwwKv6nN6 H6Yi2caKRUDRaHrL3MS9kJmvsCtWX+3hcfK744NFiUsOFU//DjgbzBlZl k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggFADhY4VKtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABbgwyBDr0OFnSCLB1ICR0BgQAnBCGHd5peqyYXkiuBFASQPIExhjaSGIMtgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.95,707,1384300800"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="15038881"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2014 17:59:46 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com [173.37.183.77]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0NHxkrI031224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:59:46 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.230]) by xhc-rcd-x03.cisco.com ([173.37.183.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:59:46 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Working Group Status
Thread-Index: AQHPGGTm0UsVQXrYY0WE6tEAI/rUtw==
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:59:45 +0000
Message-ID: <B5E65628-40C2-44FC-AE9E-C01FB85BD475@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.117]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8462964B-0A54-4CB6-9109-817FD2E898AA"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [v6ops] Working Group Status
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:59:52 -0000
I'm thinking through possible agendas for IETF 89. The following is where we stand. John is working through the two drafts that have completed WGLC.
As we have over the past several years, we have two requirements for a draft to be on the f2f agenda: it must be posted or updated since the previous IETF meeting, and it must have supportive discussion on the mailing list. I assume that working group drafts (draft-ietf-v6ops-*) have interest, and if they have been updated include them regardless. Individual submissions (draft-name-v6ops-*) come and go.
Consider this a call for new or updated drafts, and for discussion of those drafts.
RFC Ed Queue: MISSREF
Mar 18 draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-multihoming-without-ipv6nat
I have commented to the authors on the process of unsticking this draft, which I think will require some level of revision.
RFC Ed Queue: AUTH48
Nov 14 draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation
IESG:
Jan 13 draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-experience
Completed WGLC:
Oct 6 draft-ietf-v6ops-64share
Jan 12 draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6
Working Group Document updated since IETF:
Nov 26 draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem
Dec 6 draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security
Jan 13 draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis
Individual Submission to v6ops updated since IETF:
Nov 4 draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis
Dec 3 draft-taylor-v6ops-fragdrop
Dec 24 draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance
Dec 28 draft-byrne-v6ops-clatip
Jan 11 draft-osamu-v6ops-ipv4-literal-in-url
Working Group Document NOT updated since IETF:
Aug 13 draft-ietf-v6ops-dc-ipv6
Aug 14 draft-ietf-v6ops-monitor-ds-ipv6
Sep 10 draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile
Oct 21 draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations
Individual Submission to v6ops NOT updated since IETF:
Jul 30 draft-smith-v6ops-ce-dhcpv6-transparency
Oct 3 draft-elkins-v6ops-ipv6-end-to-end-rt-needed
Oct 3 draft-elkins-v6ops-ipv6-packet-sequence-needed
Oct 3 draft-elkins-v6ops-ipv6-pdm-recommended-usage
Oct 18 draft-ma-v6ops-router-test
Oct 21 draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem
Oct 21 draft-moreiras-v6ops-rfc3849bis
Oct 21 draft-rafiee-v6ops-iid-lifetime
Oct 21 draft-sun-v6ops-openv6-address-pool-management
Oct 21 draft-yang-v6ops-ipv6tran-select
- [v6ops] Working Group Status Fred Baker (fred)