IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix-01: (with DISCUSS)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Tue, 20 June 2017 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAB6131584; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:38:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.71
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.71 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RRocTZdIiVij; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BC0713155E; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id d14so63405044qkb.1; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9ejHD8QTNyIfL5FpkcsZ6ivLHAlhZQlltuIAmfsf6D4=; b=A1gQJ9zt7FCvsRVnfZwwvHcxDFpn2FWtTPhBnJfyKnKrUaXgUFTVprpb/2ROFDHmr8 vrpH5sEhOQ1LNvT/Nkif79lHeBO8VdMofSdR2HNqCBKpgWkJqfzywJnCOCfgNZPOUuHF G7gnyGR3cInelsEBp2HCfv9AzBRETYCdQtFE/oS7KgzcPWU2Nq9gpIdh/vh+OJmGANsW xHvAr+JULfQ9dof251y7VRJwMEJCSqD1OQ+a/z9HFFW/bw9FFZ6PjwRqbQPN8mlEjnnw ac32O//+WWEajzA4xri+Wa3KIRXLTs8mDJz4dqNVsrNuBWHLVeCnYXrp2UFYWpclKaLD IdLA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9ejHD8QTNyIfL5FpkcsZ6ivLHAlhZQlltuIAmfsf6D4=; b=nGu6gXeYQy/JNvpyx5krB0xZcaQqwYKhhrTXGNHNDjX2jPUsiLkzRwhOa4BLK8ymLr Ai1HmhOynHkog23F8Z+oZHBgY0DgAyakd+DnGzlpApHqXGakePYgpPpv75D8tyaEgW8P 0+h9Jy4DDq0d17ka6iKuBiJ2dU9tnb+7LX4Wgkvk61HD8NfrEtWaEublT415JOn2W56q swbmyBUUNC6WcWT4obivBdFS8eO/JX+KSGP0Iry1SJjbUMxdiu95AEPCp9UVLU3B0zOl s/tLdeMlhTScD7GpmrFeEo0lknxQvEAL7dFg8dSl1FDbxCfPK2SQ5Y+9nyWdknlUInJh 6OSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOymeffK76a1lfUtllHz4lwmw/dSFLjBm2ymJZnoS55zvMs9B8pD M0eDUPXCUBOLZ/QsU+aeSzGBv+j5AQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.197.136 with SMTP id k8mr26082998qkl.211.1497980283373; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.159.211 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.55.159.211 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 10:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170620105444.4d6e0330@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com>
References: <149789924339.10707.17736967865508385069.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170620105444.4d6e0330@echo.ms.redpill-linpro.com>
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:38:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+MHpBrx=yDaecnrfE9xp49WjH_rdV3DhO3hSV9w8z0Nr6s6Ow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Cc: V6ops Chairs <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix@ietf.org, draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1149db8cabcfe8055267b6ee"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/i38ck9C1OBCT44VIEy2uBJpf2GQ>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix-01: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:38:07 -0000

Hi Tore,
  Thanks for taking care of this quickly. I have looked at the diff and it
nicely addresses my concerns.

Regards
Suresh

On Jun 20, 2017 2:24 PM, "Tore Anderson" <tore@fud.no> wrote:

> * Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > DISCUSS:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > * Section 4.2.
> >
> > I found the explanation to be useful but the prefix that was not
> selected seems
> > to be wrong (a prefix with non-zero bits past the prefix length does not
> really
> > make sense). The prefix that is adjacent to 64:ff9b::/96 is actually
> > 64:ff9a:ffff::/48 and not 64:ff9a:ffff:ffff::/48 as described in the
> document.
> > This means that most of the text that follows is incorrect. i.e. The
> range will
> > be 64:ff9a:ffff:: - 64:ff9b::ffff:ffff and not 64:ff9a:ffff:ffff:: -
> > 64:ff9b::ffff:ffff
> >
> > P.S.: I thought hard about whether this should be a DISCUSS or a COMMENT
> but I
> > decided to go with a DISCUSS because I think it really needs to be fixed
>
> Hi Suresh,
>
> Good catch - thanks!
>
> I've prepared an update. I'd appreciate it if you could confirm that it
> resolves your concern fully before I post it to the data tracker
> though. RFC diff here:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-v6ops-
> v4v6-xlat-prefix-01&url2=https://fud.no/draft-ietf-
> v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix-02.txt
>
> Full new draft: https://fud.no/draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix-02.txt
>
> Tore
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email