IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] WG Doc? draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops

otroan@employees.org Fri, 11 March 2016 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C3412D68E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 05:02:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=employees.org; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=otroan@employees.org header.d=employees.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R8AVJxNAk4fz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 05:02:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (cowbell.employees.org [65.50.211.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E7E512D6C7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 05:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01490D7884; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 05:01:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; s=selector1; bh=awamt9kMk/KJHnTYFmmM/lP5+44=; b= YmgNX35YLLPW9vh7a27KW4iZUdHLNREx3p8Mtgzv74JchUKvUpwXC34HNmFIZUaB a4oK9CdDaQVkuV4i9zh3AdB9mRBPMlxhn9j7Sb+bpRCf0beQK3I+dZDqDQSEGxKE fo0nSpjMahkjNV0ifi+7rB8TAvgiUXaztPacNvr14rE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; q=dns; s=selector1; b=KCcOIyvtNE+2aKyBlpw4gf/uIn 9sg6UE5L0b06tgE8DvJLWV/0rFBTBqanXoqblrs6rScvI153qHw/Kb+SWD+XMoPn 8Od789FfLPQ0aWnEaA4s9Bzmk5mCoZDRZUobkGl3m45F3tqsC/Dm/RKQyJ0X7HGC OO1E6fCEWVCjtJG9Q=
Received: from h.hanazo.no (unknown [173.38.220.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5206D7882; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 05:01:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by h.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56221284091; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:01:39 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_72B23B2A-B448-4808-8800-1C8BFD1A33D4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: otroan@employees.org
In-Reply-To: <A277BE71-BD70-4AFE-97DA-F224D7DBBCB8@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 14:01:38 +0100
Message-Id: <BDA56C2D-788D-421C-B44A-1A29578F0F78@employees.org>
References: <A277BE71-BD70-4AFE-97DA-F224D7DBBCB8@cisco.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/iIzAOGrwwaNip5XJjIEtxKwLta0>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] WG Doc? draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:02:18 -0000

> The authors of draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops would like v6ops to adopt draft-gont-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops as a working group document. Yes or no?

No.

Abstract:
   "This document summarizes the security and operational implications of
   IPv6 extension headers, and attempts to analyze reasons why packets
   with IPv6 extension headers may be dropped in the public Internet."

The reasons why packets are dropped, and the security / operational implications is already covered in some of the the numerous other documents on IPv6 EHs.

Best regards,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email