[v6ops] IPv6 over 802.11p - no modifications required

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 02 December 2013 11:09 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D97B1AE351 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 03:09:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.983
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E8ZdJWwpSRYw for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 03:09:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4731AE343 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 03:09:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr []) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id rB2B9aSv009682 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:09:36 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost []) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AF98201860 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:09:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr []) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590752016BB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:09:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [] (is010446-4.intra.cea.fr []) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id rB2B9WK2015292 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:09:36 +0100
Message-ID: <529C6A6D.6070307@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:09:33 +0100
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [v6ops] IPv6 over 802.11p - no modifications required
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:09:43 -0000


Hello participants to v6ops,

Running IPv6 over 802.11p requires no modifications to the protocol: it
runs just as IPv6 over Ethernet does - same 0x86DD Ethertype, same
recommended minimal MTU, same formation of the Interface ID, ...

However, in some operational environments, some tweaks may be necessary
due to specificities of the link (e.g. OCB - outside the context of a
BSS id): frequent Router Advertisements to support handover of
high-speed vehicles through distanced Road-Side Units, and IP security
messages because the link layer has no security features.

This is what this draft describes:

"Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.11p Networks"
A. Petrescu, R. Kuntz, P. Pfister, N. Benamar

What do you think?