Re: [v6ops] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05: (with COMMENT)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 27 January 2021 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF37F3A0C7A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:06:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 114nmOJg3dYR for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:06:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com (mail-qk1-x736.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF2493A0C7C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:06:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id n7so3413762qkc.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:06:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=9mWD0c1Ba7Pr3nof/C88Q96f1wgeVId6zk2f37ab9nc=; b=sWNCx78Bwym8BuhSOU/TxGTLtnji6CEqdjDbWstD8YBFyUtN5hqgwQGHnjLAyKG01Z ytmDeVkhzGeJGdNPgsN7o08gZEuhlZxocGXHCLt0l4Bo9shELwvnph6IFvR932me26yP Rk2vjH7BF6/F66lz3yyArYTcsytda4E8d5xfFqC4FXRoyNUS33C9O1KnUr+DgbmK4qx9 SR6nUVvvVqGXNbzUB6PF3mwK1kYqYwdrhjhF8BxRnHIjbhQqfqjvdpSiSXP2Q5jvaZHk gtqCJHdWviq5MfTU/RbG1aS4+CJ7qfZGNg6h24GQ7huyHTZYpfBboB+4c8DhbNq5Cvyv z/fg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=9mWD0c1Ba7Pr3nof/C88Q96f1wgeVId6zk2f37ab9nc=; b=C3b4JtmxQekkV8RsqkSd9xOdIFCQwI8wCfW5Tly7pCLMuEw5KoIBamGjJ/ZNKCJ9kE EmUw/7voxjt800uEF1x4OwZRJvF8eq+z3JdJt+IUWlH0TTYEVjCfuH02R+W1CMUBcRtV H15gwDzVUjWJ6qZdzAxN7/tNad/5Yng4VGHeMlaBH++o9f0W2jWH5ZyfUtIBxkwmWJyr 5xFJHJHlsNQNU3tGJknlAQEkKSzrXo/XYey32AjFrC1pGkcBI6VQpKYa8FN1KfkEcCRe vzYYmlrwBvzDVwRS3Y6fwd8WH5F38HMzr+aQRi0y0wBuVFNfIpe1Ie5n8JHy5Vu1U1LA SWrA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dPQkuGbfYvWQymJAK5EpuDf4KHOoAeBv63Pzl5sEk1nXpcnMW q61izLfNd9KXMWCm35NAKikiHg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvrnuWDWWftDf4SjBaJq9xMl30/XceYxhUW/B781wZiS92AhJleOBGq31+HBLRFEKriK42tg==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a10c:: with SMTP id k12mr6238150qke.443.1611785196912; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:06:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.4.75] (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 77sm2119574qkk.29.2021.01.27.14.06.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:06:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <DAA65B0F-38F7-4785-8C5B-2E8E323C57B3@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1265B52E-19F6-4D7D-AE2B-FEFDD565C817"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:06:34 -0500
In-Reply-To: <9404f657-dbcb-877d-5a3f-1f3408c3b890@si6networks.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum@ietf.org, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, v6ops-chairs@ietf.org, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
References: <160325603610.17357.6914550111489766157@ietfa.amsl.com> <cf025acf-5192-d9a3-a727-8716d9d7b232@si6networks.com> <C68DC427-85A4-4AE7-928A-C92AD2C4488A@fugue.com> <9404f657-dbcb-877d-5a3f-1f3408c3b890@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/iVhVmqd2f5vBS2KtNTNyWmmK9DM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 22:06:41 -0000

On Jan 27, 2021, at 5:01 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> This document specifies improvements to Customer Edge Routers that help mitigate the problems that may arise when network configuration information becomes invalid, without any explicit signaling of that condition to the affected nodes. This document updates RFC7084.

“Stale” rather than “invalid” perhaps? But otherwise, yeah. You have budget for another sentence if you want to say more. :)