Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 smartphones (vs. IPv4) (was: BCP 202, RFC 7772 on Reducing Energy Consumption of Router Advertisements)

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 01 June 2016 16:13 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C9012D52B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lYEpvkZE1v6d for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6CC112B042 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 09:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4637; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464797632; x=1466007232; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=6nWUOq1al2XKoXGNLc0M/RU/yIqvJYQK/+P0AhdybLU=; b=SFbaZrWICSjdVojYzpyXvDlvfwShIrEDworD/ut6pP+ccmc/pTl/0JeL LEH3Y5NtYbNuZsQXeLADmHTITTomkElaKqmW9TfeUp83QlsyUacwfuE2k my//o97IpYst1QNjKsuKfaxzX2a6VVyoemF+PCT8ASUs1zosI2xWlQVzV I=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AVAgBuCE9X/4YNJK1dgz1WfQauIYtvDoF6FwuFbwKBMTgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEUBAQEDAQEBAUsgAgkFCwIBCBQEDBcLIQYKASUCBA4FDgYHAgSHdAMPCA69Aw2EHwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQ4OiB6CVoE5gQqBSRUFOoMMgi4FmAQzAYMqgWhthieBeY8ch2SHZwEeAUOCEyWBNW4BiQE2fwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,401,1459814400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="280292806"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Jun 2016 16:13:50 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (xch-aln-013.cisco.com [173.36.7.23]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u51GDnGO022859 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:13:50 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:13:49 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:13:49 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 smartphones (vs. IPv4) (was: BCP 202, RFC 7772 on Reducing Energy Consumption of Router Advertisements)
Thread-Index: AQHRvCCUAx/yRP/3iUuOvKaYDHQCTA==
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:13:49 +0000
Message-ID: <4B8679AA-6FA4-4D9F-A7DD-C8DD6F525EC6@cisco.com>
References: <20160211191203.4120F180472@rfc-editor.org> <5099e169-696d-54ec-a4a7-8cc773e358c5@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5099e169-696d-54ec-a4a7-8cc773e358c5@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.115]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_014F509C-4422-402A-ABAE-B7F79A628157"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/iXgyUImlBZpLDA0H-WzKmxq9-RU>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 smartphones (vs. IPv4) (was: BCP 202, RFC 7772 on Reducing Energy Consumption of Router Advertisements)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:13:55 -0000

I personally would find that interesting. As you note, we recently posted an RFC about managing power by managing activity. Andrew Yourtchenko has been interested in the chattiness of IPv6 implementations in WiFi, the issue being that it is a shared medium (not unlike an Ancient yellow Ethernet cable, and very unlike a switched network), so every hiccup reverberates throughout the network. I would expect that the issue affects mobile wireless in interesting ways. How chatty are we, and what needs to be adjusted?

Do you have something to share?

> On Jun 1, 2016, at 5:40 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi v6ops,
> 
> I wonder whether there may be interest in evaluating the energy consumption of an IPv6 application on smartphones, compared to its IPv4 counterpart.
> 
> I suspect the difference may be negligible but I am not sure.
> 
> It would be good to avoid a situation in which the end user prefers IPv4 on the smartphone because IPv6 empties the battery.
> 
> Alex
> 
> Le 11/02/2016 à 20:12, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org a écrit :
>> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>> 
>>        BCP 202
>>        RFC 7772
>> 
>>        Title:      Reducing Energy Consumption of Router
>>                    Advertisements
>>        Author:     A. Yourtchenko,
>>                    L. Colitti
>>        Status:     Best Current Practice
>>        Stream:     IETF
>>        Date:       February 2016
>>        Mailbox:    ayourtch@cisco.com,
>>                    lorenzo@google.com
>>        Pages:      6
>>        Characters: 12555
>>        See Also:   BCP 202
>> 
>>        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-03.txt
>> 
>>        URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7772
>> 
>>        DOI:        http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7772
>> 
>> Frequent Router Advertisement messages can severely impact host power
>> consumption.  This document recommends operational practices to avoid
>> such impact.
>> 
>> This document is a product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF.
>> 
>> 
>> BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
>> Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
>> improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
>> 
>> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>>  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
>> 
>> For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
>> For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
>> 
>> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
>> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
>> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
>> unlimited distribution.
>> 
>> 
>> The RFC Editor Team
>> Association Management Solutions, LLC
>> 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops