Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

["Fred Baker (fred)" <[e-mail]>]

That would be https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations; it just expired and therefore might not show up through the usual search mechanisms.

> On Nov 3, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Howard, Lee <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> I see interest from Victor Kuarsingh, David Farmer, Alexandre Petrescu, and
> Brian Carpenter. Can I ask each of you to do a review of the current
> document, and send comments to the mailing list?  That will give the
> authors
> and the WG something to work from.
> 
> Following that, we can discuss whether we need additional discussion at a
> meeting, or WGLC.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lee
> 
> 
> On 11/3/15, 9:20 AM, "Victor Kuarsingh" <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>> WG,
>> 
>> My input is that we should continue this work.  Given ULAs are already
>> in use, having a document which outlines those use cases is, in my mind,
>> operationally beneficial.
>> 
>> Perhaps we should be more clear that we would not be recommending the
>> use of ULAs, but keep to a unbiased document which outlines how they
>> have been used (just a use case discussion).  We can also include
>> objective technical points as to the pros/cons related to each use case.
>> 
>> It was also noted in another email (based on WG v6ops discussion
>> yesterday), that one such valid example was Cable Modem management IPs
>> assigned ULA based addressing.  This is a valid technical use case.
>> 
>> I am willing to help if required on this document.
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> Victor K
>> 
>> On 2015-11-02 6:17 PM, Howard, Lee wrote:
>>> This document hasn¹t had any revisions or discussion in a while.
>>> Is there anyone interested in working on it?
>>> 
>>> If we do not hear any interest, we will abandon this draft.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Lee
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> 
>>> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable
>>> proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject
>>> to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended
>>> solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby
>>> notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken
>>> in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is
>>> strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
>>> E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently
>>> delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> v6ops mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops