IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Discussion of draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Wed, 22 July 2015 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04091ACDEE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EW-yxfPUNRXD for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 839D51ACDEC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 23:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-b3b7.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-b3b7.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.179.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t6M6qZZb067733 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:52:37 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>, Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
References: <6153A91F-7E9A-4579-BA06-72964568D343@cisco.com> <55AE54D3.7070502@gmail.com> <55AE5D01.5090309@gmail.com> <55AE71F7.8000107@gmail.com> <20150721162835.26A9F338B4ED@rock.dv.isc.org> <55AE742E.9040301@gmail.com> <20150721184344.GH90924@Space.Net> <55AEA803.8070504@gmail.com>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-ID: <55AF3DB2.7060606@bogus.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 08:52:34 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55AEA803.8070504@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KbMNI9DLxIL7M0GdGpOpCj1ADx4XFx4NW"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/j9iXhHNuhQu0a4jurVYu64QTI_Q>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Discussion of draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 06:52:42 -0000

On 7/21/15 10:13 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 21/07/2015 20:43, Gert Doering a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>>> We want simple ULA addresses, simple to remember, simple to type,
>>> ideally based on a dictionary.
>>
>> Go away.  DNS exists.
> 
> Of course, DNS exists and has its role in giving good names to addresses.
> 
> Yet ULA gives a certain freedom in the hextets after fd00::, and I would
> not waste it by generating a fd00:ca10:8fa3 which has no logic.
> 
> fd00:cafe:: is a random prefix, easier to pronounce, to remember and to
> tell on the phone.

stop, please.

No document with a discussion that looks this is coming out of the IETF
so long as I am in a position to prevent it.

> Alex
> 
>>
>> Gert Doering
>>          -- NetMaster
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email