Re: [v6ops] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Wed, 24 February 2021 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36ED3A1832; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:28:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.241
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.241 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HAS_X_OUTGOING_SPAM_STAT=2.339, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EhGXjDIIrmBD; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:28:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-5.web-hosting.com (server217-5.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5FF83A1860; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:28:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=B8fD5vwom6M0cMGVbNMIjJJuOo2XBLH5WXlVjgWgTjU=; b=EGpxQsoCBDTW4HiqtfCvQNQIc 5qJShUHrehXyqjSn6dryboduCkohNpqBZfW43Smz+DrFvdMLhhnVYBbB6Ib20InF1sBri5v6lveLy 8Hth7n+3acZ47luxwbj+ttzFf8/AzpKefWUORtXHhKcnHLr/VFck7M8gOtbDjbfZW8rK6OlVDyMfj /0nSg1hY/JulOMrmNyxm/tdyKSpk2dOjn4UH3fzWBV4xNufy5Ca9yaC5GJzYPjoXuddyEAM5a1jai kvASbKBoD/84/F1OQ+h+RxlKIioQOmfj2d6MrITyULkKniJkKPUvWlPqSGYaTM0L62RwmPovRlY/n vUQADXjpQ==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:50627 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1lExxs-003qLD-BH; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 12:28:48 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9CA7104B-08BD-4E48-AA12-FB2248CB4A57"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S34dMEEJ+OPUu_=FW1Y5AQuvAaHzBPEe448S7rfbMmHN_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:28:43 -0800
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops.all@ietf.org, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, tsv-art@ietf.org
Message-Id: <C5613E33-BF8D-4C5D-99DD-E284D597FDBA@strayalpha.com>
References: <161366727749.10107.14514005068158901089@ietfa.amsl.com> <42668fb5-a355-e656-7d99-c40b3d33fb92@si6networks.com> <0e377231-c319-2157-30a0-759e2f96a692@gmail.com> <5f464f17-85ed-f105-35f9-02f35d04aed2@si6networks.com> <CALx6S364zGbq_HZNNVEaJHnHccuk4Zau2DXhmaVYbwnYQc-5bw@mail.gmail.com> <1847e8e3-543f-5deb-dd14-f7c7fa3677db@si6networks.com> <CALx6S34TPppMRJrOvyJ05LLeRvv+S51pQHJnzZDKk-qOdsF0AA@mail.gmail.com> <e41f3484-f816-e185-2d99-94323c8da732@si6networks.com> <CALx6S34qSxGijVcs229bAL5gMhMvMNYUXm3yEmrg6wxUiUAiaA@mail.gmail.com> <bf83d228-25bc-21bb-f984-d58ead6bf492@si6networks.com> <CALx6S35Kh-QAXJDAucuw5Wty37MBiwS=pqQknMZ+15b7D5Sn8A@mail.gmail.com> <34e78618-cb28-71a1-a9d3-7aec38032659@si6networks.com> <CAO42Z2zqD9_d2Fbr25Y2CV1GdzYKd167yf5DHeHna7V66pF65A@mail.gmail.com> <0bd316ac-1789-f4c6-d280-943ad6e60309@si6networks.com> <CALx6S34dMEEJ+OPUu_=FW1Y5AQuvAaHzBPEe448S7rfbMmHN_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/jIhiathJWE7pSsdfhG9cVfOaduE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-05
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:28:59 -0000


> On Feb 24, 2021, at 9:01 AM, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> wrote:
> 
>> Your example is a good one, and has indeed two parts:
>> 
>>    "If you aren't careful with a knife, you could cut yourself"
>> 
>> This is a *fact* and I don't think there's much room for debate around it.
>> 
>> 
>>   "(so be careful with a knife)"
>> 
>> *This* is advice.
>> 
>> 
>> Our document contains the former (a fact), but not the later (advice).
>> 
> Fernando,
> 
> The analogy doesn't hold here because unlike knives, extension headers
> are not inherently dangerous

Right, and any recommendation should even avoid “3 EHs are OK but 4 are not”.

The answer is that the longer the EH, the higher the risk, but any fixed limit to EHs needs to be done as a standards-track update to IPv6.

This sort of “warning about how people do it” stuff has to be tempered with the fact that this is a snapshot in time.

Joe