IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Fri, 13 November 2015 00:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D62E1A9039 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:24:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vXs32lIRDEpp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:24:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 626A51A9032 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:24:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qkcl124 with SMTP id l124so32841847qkc.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:24:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras_org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CDHAb9kLrLNXDxSrlFIP58mV7CCPKBsei58oVAs0jns=; b=lMRrbczXNaqas4t/RXZ7ajMupa+E5xiiMHJ3jjYKx24aAYfc3pG8yj/LbNBEexgKZp k/Gzxbk1+but84dg6sZ9+awTEGI/bzTOlU7TkL0mbAvAVgbl7YM3VbEm02PwPp70Qz1J cjexP2bssVRORKyrl3r3UjTQQp548rR/ssAxa114uZob9Y9ssMdXngUZXuBURGdi8u60 l3rFwrt4NNkT1rqzhYigjdrCCswTh0WimjP2e70AuMhb0Q4fkzuqCzhzSUEslHAnMe3i nlBeW6AxjEJroTAWXhH1M/mCMU24F9Z/IfCOMwmhD01LV41AtaFbldhk4zXU3EFZzXRJ eM0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CDHAb9kLrLNXDxSrlFIP58mV7CCPKBsei58oVAs0jns=; b=EtkFzfmmSAhbSkTo+WeZVanVGL++IFk7Ao8FbF/0qOICEBhuFAMzx82MCFAnPaZwuj AR67tP9ts22yAAdJ4R6IxNk28Uvpda8fBeAkbVaIq7p2CIv4urr+mVqURQWVKo6mbdUh STP4x9WzJGqJQccln3UB5SRYLeM2S8oXra01JB1CcM6zvJe5li8HnkRBIiBe9ixHI3mC NnGDdPBm7Azkv/wJgvcvCaCO6jvi3smTQe9KOnpb+ie6gqfqrCCSyW/RCuY010JcLdpO KktTjRX32GHhwq5zHyJepmW4o5PNRX0yhn52CA0VGUpZrxwf12xkgF+KOREetlgkURZN 1AIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkBiXEqyggrVcrJ5n3StDdxBBXaL/sZpAJpgxnyqhwzPz9VS+ZXNYHq/7DZxHD0qKhLDX7Z
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.145.150 with SMTP id 144mr20095355qhr.82.1447374258591; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:24:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.55.80.66 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 16:24:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:dc0:a000:4:ddff:ddf9:96dd:c63d]
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1jA_PKcjc7tiC9VhQ9yFM=SRzF6fc+fUzk89Jtb4Bvww@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1511050424410.1055@moonbase.nullrouteit.net> <20151106.063106.74659839.sthaug@nethelp.no> <CAO42Z2x3O8A1XKqN3PTcvM=xpF8W_WNSL1rVhHQ4ZY5HbVG=OQ@mail.gmail.com> <20151106.081425.74651560.sthaug@nethelp.no> <6ED54502-C5D1-4D09-877C-FE283E3EF142@delong.com> <20151112184613.GZ89490@Space.Net> <03C04D1B-86D1-4A5A-A8D3-7508CEC80DE9@delong.com> <20151112194327.GA89490@Space.Net> <95BC3D07-EF27-45A9-A1E0-12F9B43061C7@delong.com> <20151112214819.4EDE63C98D83@rock.dv.isc.org> <CAKD1Yr1jA_PKcjc7tiC9VhQ9yFM=SRzF6fc+fUzk89Jtb4Bvww@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:24:18 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn1uhQhHHQcMj1VyS5+euqEiAQMwtoaF_vsnZQWzqF=MJQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113553388a6b1e0524611466"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/jL9mY3sSVUZxm7tZSYg9c5pbmIs>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations - work or abandon?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:24:24 -0000

Strong +1. We need to stop using FUD on future routing cost to limit how we
design systems for enterprises and homes. By all means lets constrain
current behaviour to scale with memory and CPU, but to set limits 5-10-15
years out based on fear of a situation which is unlikely to emerge, and
will emerge into different technology and models.. Well its sad.

Its Dionysius Lardner "60mph will kill humans, stop speeding up steam
trains" thinking.

Whats even weirder, is that its some people who helped displace prior art,
telephone number centric thinking who are doing it. How come the former
rebels have become the empire?

_G

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
>
>> And how many SME's are there in the world?  This paper [1] puts the
>> number at 125M MSME world wide.  That's 125M routing slots if
>> everyone gets a /48.
>>
>
> I doubt that all but a small fraction of those SMEs actually need
> multihoming. But even for those that do - we should be working on making it
> possible to multihome using src+dst routing, not NPT66 or NAT66.
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email