Re: [v6ops] out-of-focus: why DHCPv6 breaks Android computers?

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 30 October 2019 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25B312002F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s2bSu7Elrjey for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2203B120019 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x9UFr5Nt008553; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 16:53:05 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 87F5F2066BF; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 16:53:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2E9206689; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 16:53:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x9UFr5bY030961; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 16:53:05 +0100
To: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <8DA54CF0-B7D7-4E4B-BA85-EA024401DEAC@fugue.com> <EA825926-BD88-4B10-84F8-91E25C1BBA6D@cisco.com> <dd6a2619-d8b0-0b9e-b3f9-77919b1ca9ba@gmail.com> <A4BAB441-D099-4BB0-BE62-F112641F6AB7@cisco.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <411309a8-3f75-8d62-c656-51ac755413d4@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 16:53:05 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A4BAB441-D099-4BB0-BE62-F112641F6AB7@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/jMCX2ejqhfL57aPiaP1cruezfZw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] out-of-focus: why DHCPv6 breaks Android computers?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:53:12 -0000


Le 30/10/2019 à 04:35, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) a écrit :
> 
> Yes, same prefix can be specified in DHCPv6 server and router RA PIO.
> If ever a conflict between the IPv6 addresses at a host, then the
> host could use DAD to resolve the conflict (and recycle the SLAAC
> derived address). Standard machinery.

Why would conflict result into recycling through a SLAAC process and not 
a DHCP exchange.

There's no std machinery for that.

Alex