IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ipversion6-loopback-prefix-00.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Tue, 17 February 2015 02:24 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5617C1A702D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:24:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9yA_ThLSDU34 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:24:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0FF01A6FCF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:24:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iecat20 with SMTP id at20so37949090iec.12 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:24:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=aThrm/BHgmsXbqkcihASBkhdj0gjjvAVrF38J6XtUD8=; b=VS1czrg1Av1LzB/pw+/tMz1mn7BwvkS8SgnjenYpob1Mvckug0ihI5Wa0DwyFlz6/g 18oYuhlDtRNMqlBGIY/D0HYyM0j83iFV11ycXvnAhNvTdAQ8H8eGL/rxjJKSqJXBnBB6 tEXGZUHqO3GxECW4CCsKPkN2sI7WrRD5tYjARmaY0Q1UkbGbp8dtteLf5E0P4muq550X LzJ5uHOn5cJAIN8E4maRfS4/Uh7j3sz1pjuCTPEkoYgTbSEjVloU1DlvuYzKtp4jYuCM 221FDOeCvWllgxhH/K+ZgDa4BgtkSsp4DZ3tuQLpPzfb4QIcqeXsFJfnTgoiCohzhqCy zd8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=aThrm/BHgmsXbqkcihASBkhdj0gjjvAVrF38J6XtUD8=; b=ODs6RkzwUHFavyteXQFRNCMNK07meZacUGj559MAkSYBw2IUHoqjOTg/ce+/DmYItd JF/u4OCp9s1oJ25jtXrg4nbwdjjr2eLDu7kVxElDC9WWLVpYZCZVxxPdeOU3e/HE+v61 MUjHa1lOEGdgz9yAEmJxUkF3JYbzzlkog3Ymk9GkBhfzAVZcOfuoIV29JFpQ2/vjtlgr f7ljUJFnNVzO3XDEmyFzHBOGqFDd3IjHDkabIoNXTra/TIkfm3J7faewc+XsZ2zN/CrA EeaH7cxLs42EpQJj2LgCFaQsh74jA3icB/so8YFKB8LZi6HzCfrmHYADywDpa+DpgA2c 4KHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkv1kUHz9AqFUirNDG0h6BWiAcOL/Pb3HGSU1u5IeSpDKdvMndarU2AI0hTj2XKuto/UXFj
X-Received: by 10.50.137.99 with SMTP id qh3mr25496762igb.7.1424139857154; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:24:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.33.104 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:23:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54E2A454.3080908@iridiumlinux.org>
References: <D1076758.8F7D%edward.lewis@icann.org> <419285087.7936915.1424128613951.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <54E2A454.3080908@iridiumlinux.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 11:23:57 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0oR78UWubp4ZfWQgua5SEw1cFiKJbidDbCqxKWquKGew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Falcon Darkstar Momot <falcon@iridiumlinux.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3bcbc4c0353050f3f664b"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/jWApBzbqfgq6OCY1GY2etJjbfA8>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ipversion6-loopback-prefix-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 02:24:19 -0000

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Falcon Darkstar Momot <
falcon@iridiumlinux.org> wrote:

> Allocating a large swath of IPv6 address space, even though we have a
> lot of it, seems like exactly the wrong thing to do here -- addresses
> are addresses, not tags.
>

That doesn't make sense. A /64 *is* a large swath of IPv6 address space.
And there are lots of them.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email