Re: [v6ops] IPv6 and 5G will make life hell for spooks and cops say Australia's spooks and cops • The Register

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 08 March 2018 10:45 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D93124C27 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 02:45:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i8BdK-lyq1KP for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 02:45:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A23C1205F0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 02:45:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id w28Aj5Mx116134; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:45:05 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id BF77B204350; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:45:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DEB2042E5; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:45:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id w28Aj5ta008250; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:45:05 +0100
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <1e03132f-9220-a55c-8d48-0216b6b5e306@gmail.com> <976066da-49d0-0fc7-2b19-4196398c837d@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803070831370.20609@uplift.swm.pp.se>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5aae4fee-bd3a-4363-24cd-af95f2505082@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 11:45:05 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803070831370.20609@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/jcJVYHabs7mvAZF4VJ0kVOjHcyI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 and 5G will make life hell for spooks and cops say Australia's spooks and cops • The Register
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 10:45:10 -0000


Le 07/03/2018 à 08:33, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit :
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> 
>> Well, if 5G IPv6 is a hell for spooks and cops then 4G IPv4 was a
>> hell too: nobody tracks people by IP addresses in cellular
>> networks.
> 
> The information about who had what address at what time is typically
>  kept, so that an IP address can be tracked back to a subscription.

YEs that information is typically kept, but it's complex to use to track
someone because it changes all the time at each handover or re-connection.

> In IPv6, this is done by prefix and not by address in a 3GPP network
> (since a /64 is used per PDP).

YEs, I agree.  YEt the certainty that IP prefix gives is fuzzy.

(IP address privacy technology _is_ good but little relevant in mobile
networks)

Alex