Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it> Wed, 12 October 2011 13:57 UTC

Return-Path: <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEA621F8C2F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 06:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FigrhvWO41NU for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 06:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GRFEDG702BA020.telecomitalia.it (grfedg702ba020.telecomitalia.it [156.54.233.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AB521F8C10 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 06:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GRFHUB701BA020.griffon.local (10.188.101.111) by GRFEDG702BA020.telecomitalia.it (10.188.45.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:57:08 +0200
Received: from GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local ([10.188.101.16]) by grfhub701ba020.griffon.local ([10.188.101.111]) with mapi; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:57:08 +0200
From: Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>
To: "'STARK, BARBARA H'" <bs7652@att.com>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:57:07 +0200
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
Thread-Index: AcyIIqgLtG0cLqI5S/6UvGcFzVWxAQAAv1twACPW4IAACmn1YAAB9wnQ
Message-ID: <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB758B7AE@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>
References: <201110111355.p9BDt1M23806@ftpeng-update.cisco.com><282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB758B7A8@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local> <1B8E4C5A-D08B-4F37-B701-A39745136A33@cisco.com> <750BF7861EBBE048B3E648B4BB6E8F4F1FDCA4C3@crexc50p> <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB758B7AB@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local> <750BF7861EBBE048B3E648B4BB6E8F4F1FDCAC83@crexc50p>
In-Reply-To: <750BF7861EBBE048B3E648B4BB6E8F4F1FDCAC83@crexc50p>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Ullio Mario <mario.ullio@telecomitalia.it>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:57:14 -0000

Hi Barbara,
   the main issue we see today  for the DS-Lite deployment is exactly the DS-Lite support on the CPE.
We only have some prototypes CPE's with DS-Lite at the moment and that's why we are struggling to start with a deployment now.
You say you would prefer adding in the document "now" technologies and I understand that, but to me this sounds like a chicken and egg problem because CPE's vendors are reluctant to implement features if they don't have a RFC number.
So coming back to your question about the timeframe for DS-Lite deployment, I would say next year, but in my opinion if we want a deployment for next year we need an RFC now.
Thanks,
Best regards,
Roberta

-----Original Message-----
From: STARK, BARBARA H [mailto:bs7652@att.com]
Sent: mercoledì 12 ottobre 2011 15.17
To: Maglione Roberta; Fred Baker
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org; Ullio Mario
Subject: RE: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

Hey Roberta,
Could you help us understand the timeframe of DS-Lite (and PCP)? I have
little visibility into DS-Lite deployments. I've been pushing for
DS-Lite support in the 6204bis draft, because I see a lot of interest in
it from European providers; so maybe you're in a better position to know
where it's at. Do you see deployments happening now, a year from now, 2
years from now? I'm trying to "bully" others into making sure we have
something published for technologies being deployed now, by insisting
that the "now" technologies must not be held back by the "next year"
technologies.
Thanks,
Barbara

Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie.

This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks.