Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 04 February 2015 12:11 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381F21A00C6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 04:11:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7_Gf7iV6_2vu for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 04:11:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4B651A00C0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 04:11:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id t14CBhix013988 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:11:43 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AA7520249A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:12:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC58B202491 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:12:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is010446-4.intra.cea.fr [10.8.33.116]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id t14CBfpT016953 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 13:11:43 +0100
Message-ID: <54D20C7D.3060406@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 13:11:41 +0100
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <8B808F0C-1AA8-4ABE-A06E-80652B9C1498@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8B808F0C-1AA8-4ABE-A06E-80652B9C1498@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/kSf0j5GZbRc_nVOA01V_ZNtGSFw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 12:11:48 -0000

I support this draft.

I support it for a particular reason: its stance with respect to
DHCPv6-PD.  It mandates the DHCPv6-PD feature (where other
documents like RFC7066 IPv6/cell are very diffuse about this
requirement).  This is needed, because ongoing IPv6-over-foo documents,
and RFC 7278 "tethering", tell the best way is DHCPv6-PD, despite
deployments missing it.

But I am aware of a risk: it is possible to put up an RFC and its
technique to never get deployed, however strong the language is.

Alex

Le 28/01/2015 17:57, Fred Baker (fred) a écrit :
> draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile has been through Quite a bit
> of change in the IESG. The ADs would like to see the working group
> read it again and comment - working group last call - before they
> proceed. To summarize, it provides requirements for handsets that
> would work in a specific business model. As such, it builds on RFC
> 6434 and 7066, strengthening some of those requirements, and going
> on to add requirements related to 464xlat and other technologies.
>
> Please read it now, and comment. This WGLC will run until 15
> February.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>