IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] As promised...

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 23 July 2015 13:10 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B851A026E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 06:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CCs-2AFnvGbI for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 06:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAAA61A00EE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 06:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1851; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1437657035; x=1438866635; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=xGoFNvYEPAIUk19LAV1HfkbCMk7hwZufBuB9Vl3lTFw=; b=ahaSf1idK+jqQ9FjpD3z1w6RXLwT+YztXZGjdmjdufolRk7eqntUa+Qx M+KPnaffdslKPkVOxK2YtRg9ofuaMsYaRuUR2KCWzQHZm1gWiUJCsDMzu QBDVORpE4kEQKTFTgV/JRN3OqxS44BMJ4/VXd5zmxKvWLIyQrmqoeRU+d Y=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AiAwCE57BV/4oNJK1cgxVUb7teCYF3h0k4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQqgQsBgQAnBCGIIA2lNaYBAQEBAQEBBAEBAQEBAQEBARUEk3GBFAWUYAGCNoFXaIdEAYFDhy2QKiaDfII2gQQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,530,1432598400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="14275047"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Jul 2015 13:10:13 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6NDADDL003819 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:10:13 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.49]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:10:13 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: As promised...
Thread-Index: AQHQxUjo4qd1bH7KWEePbHjqAVDWAg==
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:10:12 +0000
Message-ID: <E8058299-E0DF-487A-BAB5-31B7A5EAC3B9@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.61.91.41]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3E7B8DFA-8F15-40E8-9E5C-39946CD72C4F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/kmmqrwaqcTwIixFi_GdOJw-E-Hw>
Subject: [v6ops] As promised...
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 13:10:37 -0000

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption
  "Reducing energy consumption of Router Advertisements", Andrew
  Yourtchenko, Lorenzo Colitti, 2015-07-23,

We had quite a bit of discussion Tuesday, especially considering the length (or brevity) of this draft.

I'd suggest you read it. Especially given the number of "+2" comments on the list, I tend to think we can come to consensus relatively quickly on it. If there are lingering issues, let's get them out of the way.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email