IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hilliard-v6ops-host-addr-update-00.txt

Scott Morizot <tmorizot@gmail.com> Tue, 18 July 2017 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <tmorizot@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06319131BC2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11D6euAfHSV5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x231.google.com (mail-ua0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87993131B47 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 64so33508127uae.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:14:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mJELhA4/jro/YwEdAu6ksVBCgLZAwnfquysRDj0IRFk=; b=PqrYsHuzYKzfZY7DIuuF7oqrY4RJWsrCbi5RBsHmax9kik8dBHdAWQg6nq2t90Rp7W Yt+5XkLDAKhAJOSVzLqqLq5WNvfhtdbDmQ/LtJy0NEp6sN4CNJWSZaBlscqKQM7CwtEw JLaBkfw67oRVbuHZguSGOaiXvQ6o+NcIfBh6gDUbFj2GCu/D6cniovvNyNhxZ3US9psI AnNji7ENsJ3arC2Kl2OVfnFyC6Whyn3AOmNkVw9lJy+A/TD/BkgoaWw+blMEXuNojibd 9tE0oHzYk1u/dZkiC1Un+SSNUAAEl4vBEC2PBy+OuyD6lFWaZDoeRsetXswzHWpwMGir JxLw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mJELhA4/jro/YwEdAu6ksVBCgLZAwnfquysRDj0IRFk=; b=j1NH5Ei+KXIRUefi54PpPDyyM7mZ7QISMASQxfunbxHf3aR0wvU89UlBodeLHHI67y sbnVLFyeOrqHRE+ZVckS7zU9Eb0h0ejw7+Z1eaYmY+w3xgSzdCwVVhNI+GTnjp8bibrq X8IM9NIY2w2mpNDqiq9ezvON56Wn8eRknlBlBuwdx1bm+Umk6oI9sQ7K4CgmVW6pb5Ip AXrzSkDJ482Oj2uoRtbJ8a4wrqvEB97KjngjznUG1/HFstZH+yIIH3U5GZlGYaP78pB0 U+fHOy9b5T28KRMT5Uz0GTejVGog1h6gT3RyPjWlSKNkj4XOYvNWAmg3xoClqfuVcHWP XEyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113xCFbTahdSFt5QxdVaapLSmOeR6kI5HOO4CA5uaBz5F0Z0LwHU scPpaoO346YYIgdTcn4EgkXU8C6cxiTxI/E=
X-Received: by 10.31.66.141 with SMTP id p135mr1444352vka.85.1500401651738; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.164.72 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1max8-arTFZ7kymK36ny4DqWF2bkmfh1qf_ioQwCSfHAg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <596CF817.8040900@foobar.org> <CAO42Z2wFSXWru_Tgwpuf2xgOCr2iX0BwrTHvnS2TcR6EQBi1Fw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFy81rmZefKx6jTsS+8J9fJANXwm1cOKdE6L17Yu4xri4xgY7g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1max8-arTFZ7kymK36ny4DqWF2bkmfh1qf_ioQwCSfHAg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Scott Morizot <tmorizot@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 13:14:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFy81rnn_SMRDMHrfNPHS85OUCzyrhr=Zot=eQP212M_8YDEbQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144b32678eef005549b7bdd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ksFZrH9dD1Ixr2HPDYlG7Wbec_s>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-hilliard-v6ops-host-addr-update-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 18:14:14 -0000

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> So what exactly would an update accomplish?   Please don't send another
> long wall of text.   Just explain how we can balance these two competing
> needs better than we currently are doing?
>
>
As a recommendation for host address assignment on a general purpose
network, it's fine. However, it appears that making DHCPv6 IA_NA/IA_TA NOT
RECOMMENDED for host address assignment in that context is being taken as a
reason by some to recommend against hosts supporting it. I can see the
logic being used. If the IETF recommends against it for networks, it should
recommend against support for it in hosts. But that's not exactly the same
thing. Again, from a practical perspective I don't think it will matter
much either way. But I was simply trying to point out that there are some
pretty large networks out there where the general recommendation really
doesn't apply.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email