Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes

"Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com> Thu, 18 July 2013 01:46 UTC

Return-Path: <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE97921F9C82 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TJPN++ffr5cE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD5121F9D24 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ATN79701; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 01:46:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 02:45:14 +0100
Received: from nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.36) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 02:46:09 +0100
Received: from NKGEML506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.240]) by nkgeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.36]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:46:02 +0800
From: "Liubing (Leo)" <leo.liubing@huawei.com>
To: Roberta Maglione <robmgl.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes
Thread-Index: AQHOg1eHpbw5q0mb6UaW7BRGXefv9ZlpqWVQ
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 01:46:01 +0000
Message-ID: <8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D750E05@nkgeml506-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAKOT5KqHzp9EXK4+PXT_J72h7CNXptD-Arot1x8xSy70kKp9+w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKOT5KqHzp9EXK4+PXT_J72h7CNXptD-Arot1x8xSy70kKp9+w@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.161]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8AE0F17B87264D4CAC7DE0AA6C406F453D750E05nkgeml506mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 01:46:26 -0000

Hi, Roberta

Thanks for your comments.

From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Roberta Maglione
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 9:39 AM
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes

Hello,
I agree with Victor on the following:
>Links to MIF documents may be useful here.
the document would benefit from some references to mif documents
[Bing] Yes, will do.

>In section 3.1 the, the text is prescriptive in suggesting one dose not use multiple provisioning domains (DHCP) to configure hosts
agree this text is to prescrictive and the document  seems to take a strong position without enough explanations/rationals
[Bing] Yes, I need to care about the wording and make more investigation.

>am not sure this document should suggest how to deal with it, but perhaps point to other documents which deal with multiple addresses which
 > provision across multiple domains.
there are ongoing discussions in other WGs in opinion this draft should refer to the ongoing work instead of taking its own conclusion
[Bing] I'm aware of DHC WG is working on this, I'll keep on tracking the progress. Thanks.

Best regards,
Bing

Thanks,
Regards
Roberta


regards,

Victor  K