Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies
Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn> Mon, 22 January 2018 13:11 UTC
Return-Path: <xing@cernet.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DB91270FC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 05:11:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8NT7BU1toDzQ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 05:11:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tsinghua.edu.cn (smtp26.tsinghua.edu.cn [101.6.4.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BF6126C2F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 05:11:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [101.5.137.88] (unknown [101.5.137.88]) by app-5 (Coremail) with SMTP id EwQGZQCHjRHn4mVaLqncAw--.40485S2; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:11:04 +0800 (CST)
Message-ID: <5A65E2E8.9010102@cernet.edu.cn>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:11:04 +0800
From: Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lee Howard <lee@asgard.org>
CC: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <D687BC24.92CC1%lee@asgard.org>
In-Reply-To: <D687BC24.92CC1%lee@asgard.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040504080504000807020505"
X-CM-TRANSID: EwQGZQCHjRHn4mVaLqncAw--.40485S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7ZF18ur1kWryfXw1UAF4UCFg_yoW8CrWDpF WrKw47KF1rJrn5Gw1kXw48Xa1FyFnxtw4xAFnxtwn8AFZ8tF1vqryvka98C3s8Gwn3Wr1U XrWa9ryDZFs5AFJanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUvYb7Iv0xC_Kw4lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4l84ACjcxK6xII jxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwV C2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVWxJr0_GcWle2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG6I8v x48I62xC7I0kMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8JVWxJwAm72 CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IY64vIr41l7480Y4vEI4kI2Ix0rVAqx4xJMxkIecxE wVAFwVW5GwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F4 0E14v26r106r1rMI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jrv_JF1l IxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxV AFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWUJVWrZr1UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v2 6r4j6F4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07 bwSdkUUUUU=
X-CM-SenderInfo: p0lqwqxfhu0vvwohv3gofq/
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/lXTfjIwXW0acsX6z9VQWQmWUbEc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 13:11:13 -0000
Lee Howard 写道: Thanks for the summary. > > The WG Chairs were discussing the various transition technologies at > some length today. > I mentioned a previous conversation in another forum that led to this > list of networks and their mechanisms: > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ksOoWOaRdRyjZnjLSikHf4O5L1OUTNOO_7NK9vcVApc/edit#gid=0 > (Corrections and additions encouraged, especially with links) > > Our impression was that of the 26+ transition mechanisms defined, only > a few have any modern relevance (editorial comments are mine, not > consensus positions): > 6rd. It may be that its light is waning, with early deployments > moving to native IPv6, and no new deployments. > DS-Lite. Widely deployed, existing support among home gateway > manufacturers. > NAT64/464xlat. Implies NAT64, SIIT, which may be used elsewhere. > Handset CLATs. No home gateway CLAT yet. > MAP-T. Announced trials and lots of buzz, but no large-scale > deployments, no home gateway support yet. > MAP-E. Some buzz, no announced trials or deployments, no home > gateway support yet. > Native dual-stack. Still the gold standard, but doesn’t solve IPv4 > address shortage. > > (Note that “yet” may change at any time). > As a matter of discussion, do you agree? > To guide our work, is there work we should do to document or deprecate > any of these? FYI, we deployed Stateless translators (IVI) between IPv4 and IPv6 backbones with about 30Gbps traffic, which are used for (1) a couple of IPv6-only servers (2) 30+ campus networks with double translation (a variation of MAP-T) see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xli-v6ops-cernet-deployment-03 for more information. Regards, xing > > Thanks, > > Lee > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops >
- [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Sander Steffann
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Sander Steffann
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Tim Chown
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Xing Li
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Templin, Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Sander Steffann
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Fred Baker
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Toerless Eckert
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Lee Howard
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies nick.heatley
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Kossut Tomasz - Hurt
- Re: [v6ops] discussion of transition technologies Yannis Nikolopoulos