IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 03 February 2012 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF2621F8528 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:04:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tl3he7zj66tE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:04:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B4521F8517 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:04:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1RtQIj-000GLh-1T; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:04:09 +0000
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:04:07 +0900
Message-ID: <m2pqdvaat4.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F2C4854.40701@unfix.org>
References: <CAD6AjGSRUdx32arseR26RzHNtMri8Vrif3dCQmuk7B52GmoHAw@mail.gmail.com> <FBD9BBC7-A537-4ABE-ABEB-76098F1BB415@cisco.com> <4F2C4854.40701@unfix.org>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: v6ops v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:04:28 -0000

> I very much appreciate the folks writing these operational reports.
> 
> I do not think they fit in the RFC process, though they are great for
> discussing pro's and con's about a certain solution. IMHO They are
> much better fit for the various conferences out there.

excuse!  for many kinds of protocols, i-ds/rfcs of operability and
interoperability are a required part of the ietf process.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email