IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] 6204 bis and mtu

Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> Sat, 12 May 2012 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8F021F85FB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.041
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.041 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7mc-C4HzLbsi for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEB821F84A7 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so4069630pbc.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XJ3vVFTc55IGAiz8XiyQISrNjd7tx08oYho0KUabUco=; b=wjzE2BBKyk4yqMI1pTe7+6aBO2i7gdl3aC6CXv8k5oVaEInoRUVi5y3T6QB8TfLqJ8 co+SR9RT62aNVECKg10X4dlfA2xwnA6TlLwyfGSbebWtOwHH+uo7HZRGIhUW8fepwsqo rZNwmWz5PjeoyR55+khinD1sLJ9OZNydBHIsjCbcDN/KcjMPbOI87pInai6nPNNB7P68 3j2D3V/3sjrDVbMlj3Ohqco6IFyWxzCXgMyCmYGLHQsISphL+7iKpdyXvibvVYajnM49 hOm2VYPr1MRhOwSXWVhnKeX619yLwS+ZJnHQR/QOA9Dxa7hGJg+Ea2JkeIzTVIkfO5E0 YrCw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.132.34 with SMTP id or2mr304509pbb.118.1336783539148; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.143.66.2 with HTTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.143.66.2 with HTTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 17:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 17:45:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGTghX9PNpiAVM7miEN+oskuwE4DTDfO6rv2q74URo3tPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15a4d9fe168404bfcc2b0f
Subject: [v6ops] 6204 bis and mtu
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 00:45:40 -0000

On May 11, 2012 4:35 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't support MSS rewrite language in 6204bis.  Most of our members
are
> > considering solutions other than DS-Lite.
>
> so you want ds-lite to fail?
>
> and here i thought we tried to engineer things to succeed.  live and
> learn.
>
> randy, who is not particularly a ds-lite fan
>

6204bis is about bringing ds-lite into opetation. So it needs to address a
well know and highly impactful issue regarding mtu treatment.

Make ds-lite operational or send it to historical.

Allowing operators to slam into this brick wall is not acceptable.

Cb _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.2.1 | Report a Bug | By Email