[v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability discussion

["Fred Baker (fred)" <[e-mail]>]

In the discussion this morning, we wound up in a position that I could not call "consensus", even "rough consensus", but per a hum of those in the room, within shouting distance of achieving that. Several people spoke at the mike asking for a sentence or brief discussion to be added, or a section clarified.

In the interest of expediency, let me ask those who spoke (and anyone else that has an issue) to respond to this note (copying the list) with suggested text. It might be best if this is stated as

OLD TEXT
the text that should be replaced goes here
NEW TEXT
the text that should replace it goes here

or

LOCATION
identify the section the text should go into
PROPOSED TEXT
the text that should be added goes here

I'll permit the authors to declare suggested text out of scope; some of the discussion this morning left them commenting on scope and scope creep. However, I do ask them to justify the exclusion to the list, rather than just ignore the email.

This comment period ends 15 November.